Return to Islam Watch main site

Islam Watch

Telling the truth about Islam: Islam under scrutiny by ex-Muslims
Welcome to Islam Watch Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

Last post 01-19-2007, 7:20 AM by archimedez. 9 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  12-26-2006, 5:54 PM 2776

    Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar

    "You can't back down, you can't chicken out, you can't be afraid, you got to have faith in Allah, and you got to stand up and be a real Muslim," Detroit native Keith Ellison said to loud applause.

    "Allahu akbar" - God is great - was the reply of many in the crowd...


    Editor,
    Islam-watch.org
  •  12-27-2006, 6:21 PM 2779 in reply to 2776

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    Mr Ellison is not afraid to speak his mind which is good news, GW has been touting God every day of his term. The only reason people are taking notice is that this fellow is Muslim. Wait until the mainstream press realizes Barack Obamas middle name is Hussein....

    Tiermo - unbanned
  •  01-06-2007, 4:56 PM 2874 in reply to 2779

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    Now that is something I was unaware of, I wonder how the media and right wing will use that information as the election draws nearer. I cannot believe that they would leave the name Hussein not make some sort of news. However that being said I do think that Mr Obama is an effective representative and sounds like a very good candidate.

    Facingeast
  •  01-07-2007, 8:29 PM 2900 in reply to 2874

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    FacingEast

    Obama's middle name did make the rounds on talk shows, more as a joke, and more due to its similarity with Saddam Hussein, rather than his partial Islamic heritage.  By this time next year, Saddam will have been forgotten, and given the PC attitudes that dominate both parties, this is unlikely to come up.
  •  01-17-2007, 4:43 AM 3043 in reply to 2900

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    I hope that it does not become a factor and believe he and Mr Ellison deserve to prove themselves before jugdement is rendered on them. I think that in a few months Mr Ellison's choice to be sworn in on the Koran will be forgotten as well and people will see that it was a big stink about nothing. From what I have read he is a very effective representative for his constituents.

    Facingeast
  •  01-17-2007, 9:51 AM 3064 in reply to 3043

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    Keith Ellison has admitted that he was a member of Nation of Islam, a Black supremacist group which demonizes Whites and Jews. Ellison has failed to adequately and clearly condemn that racist organization.

    Also, of course, Ellison has failed to condemn that book of hate and terror, the Koran; worse, he has endorsed it 100% and thus has, in effect, either tacitly declared his opposition to non-Muslims, or else shown that he is ignorant of the contents of the book. There are no excuses for an educated man such as Ellison to be endorsing such an atrocious book as the Koran.

    -Arch
  •  01-17-2007, 6:32 PM 3073 in reply to 3064

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    Mr Ellison has never admitted he was a member of the NOI nor hav e they indicated he was. He wrote a few position papers for them, get your facts straight.
  •  01-18-2007, 10:12 AM 3082 in reply to 3073

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    FacingEast,

    I suspect you are playing semantics with the word "member." Ellison's involvement with NOI goes far beyond mere membership, because he (a.k.a Keith Hakim, Keith X Ellison and Keith Ellison-Muhammad) himself was engaged in writing NOI propaganda and organizing, and spans far beyond the "18 months" to which he admitted. The public record indicates that his involvement with NOI spans at least 1989-1995.

    Ellison's present claim that he did not know about the NOI's anti-white and anti-Jewish beliefs and objectives is about as credible as a former KKK member claiming that he didn't know about their white-supremacist views. It is absolutely absurd. Either Ellison is incompetent, or he is lying.

    Ellison's apology to one Jewish organization is not only inadequate but is also suspect, because he didn't apologize until it was politically useful for him to do so. Why did it take him so long to denounce the NOI?

    For information on Ellison, see this, this , this , this, and this.

    Of present concern are Ellison's connections to CAIR, which itself is tied to HAMAS--another genocidal organization, and his claim to be a follower of the Koran, which has been shown to be predominantly a book of hate and Muslim supremacism. If Ellison believes in the Koran, then he believes and approves of non-Muslims being tortured and burned for all eternity simply because they are not Muslim like him.



    -Arch
  •  01-19-2007, 6:37 AM 3100 in reply to 3082

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    I hypothesize, like you with me, that you are a frustrated white american male whom needs to take his frustration of failure to a blog because he cannot adequately deal with people in person, again a hypothesis so prove it wrong. Ellison was elected by a non muslimwhite majority and that is fact. He admited his miss-steps inhis youth and has now begun a career of serving the public of the USA.
  •  01-19-2007, 7:20 AM 3103 in reply to 3100

    Re: Keith Ellison's crowd: Allahu Akhbar [Am Thinker]

    Facingeast,

    You say: "I hypothesize, like you with me, that you are a frustrated white american male whom needs to take his frustration of failure to a blog because he cannot adequately deal with people in person, again a hypothesis so prove it wrong."
    Wrong again. Also, you do not hypothesize like me at all. I'm not interested in your skin color, for one thing, but I do hypothesize that you are a liar, or at least that you have lied on multiple occasions in our Forum. [And yes, you did just utter a racist slur above]

    I can deal with people in person or on this Forum; the fact that I post here no more suggests that I am "frustrated" than you are, as you also post here. I might add that you seem exceptionally determined--perhaps even obsessed--with posting here. Me? I do it because I have a job to do here. The media, with some exceptions, is slack and lacks knowledge and critical perspective in its treatment Islam*, ergo some of us volunteers have to pick up the slack.

    *Of course, that is true of the media on a variety of topics.

    And what were you saying before about being an infrequent poster? My, my, you seemed to have become a frequent regular very quickly.

    -Arch
View as RSS news feed in XML
Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems