This is how
we treat the infidels in Saudi Arabia:
We
abuse the non-Muslims living and working in Saudi Arabia all the
time, especially the Christians and the Jews.
We call them grandsons of pigs and monkeys. We say
this openly, everywhere, particularly in mosques.
We do not respect any religions except Islam. This
is the Saudi official policy: all religions other than Islam are
false. Only Islam is the true religion. To accomplish this
extremely bigoted notion, the Saudi state policy is to convert to
Islam as many infidels as possible. So, proselytising for Islam is
a major activity of the government and the religious department.
Those who convert to Islam are rewarded handsomely. This is a kind
of bribe, you might say-to force infidels into Islam. Those
preachers and Islamic workers who succeed in converting the
loathsome infidels to Islam might also expect to be richly
rewarded.
In Saudi Arabia, discrimination against the
non-Muslims is absolutely rampant, very clear and open. It starts
with aqama (red cards for the non-Muslims and green cards
for the Muslims). The rule on taxation is also different for the
Muslims and the non-Muslims. This is open, clear and meticulously
planned Islamic apartheid which might even surpass the enormity of
the apartheid policies of the erstwhile South African government.
In Saudi Arabia, non-Muslims are merely tolerated.
They have no right to build any places of worship for their
customary religious rituals and practices. Non-Muslims are not
allowed to observe their rites, celebrate their religious
festivals or even extend congratulations to one another in front
of any Saudis. If any infidels dare to carry out his religion
openly, he is threatened with immediate deportation from Saudi
Arabia.
Non-Muslims living in Saudi Arabia cannot marry any
Muslim women. This is completely forbidden.
No non-Saudi could acquire Saudi Nationality either
by birth or through naturalisation. Recently, there have been some
minor changes to the Citizenship laws, but no non-Muslim could
ever be awarded with Saudi citizenship.
Infidels living in Saudi Arabia cannot build their
own schools.
Non-Muslims who are lucky enough to live in their
own compounds can practice their religious activities in secret,
out-of-sight of Muslims. This means they have to live like
prisoners in their abodes. They could never invite any Muslims in
their homes.
During the month of Ramadan, non-Muslims are
instructed by the Saudi authorities to respect the religious
feeling of the Muslims. The infidels are ordered not to consume
any food in front of Muslims. Any violation of this requirement
might result in expulsion from Saudi Arabia of the infidel
culprit-merely for eating in the presence of a Muslim. That is
why, at the outset, in the month of Ramadan, to show respect to
the Muslims, the government announces that if the infidels want to
consume food they must do this in hiding, completely out of view
of any Muslims. I have a premonition that the Muslims living in
Europe, very soon, might demand such a law from the governments of
their host countries.
The law of Sharia in Saudi Arabia forces
non-Muslim women to wear Muslim costume abaya. If any
non-Muslim women refuse to comply with this rule she will be in
deep trouble with the enforcement authority.
Saudi authorities exert enormous pressure on the
non-Muslims to convert to Islam. I have personally witnessed this
forced conversion right in front of my eyes. And, to tell the
truth, to the joy of many Wahabi Islamists, the Islamic
authority is quite successful in this subtle forced conversion
into Wahabi brand of Islam. To perpetuate such religious
propaganda and coercion, these events of Wahabi Islam
conversions are advertised in the leading newspapers with great
fanfare which includes the photographs of the newly-converted
Muslims published in the media.
In Saudi Arabia, unless a non-Muslim had converted
to Islam, he/she is not eligible to receive any charity (Zakat)
whatsoever. That is why many infidels from poor countries are
enticed to convert to Islam so that the rich Saudi Muslims could
earn Allah's blessings by bestowing charity to these poor
converts.
Now,
contrast those despicable treatments of non-Muslims in Saudi
Arabia with the treatment of Muslims in infidel lands.
Saudi Arabia builds mosques all around the world,
especially in America and Europe.
Muslims living in infidel lands enjoy full right to
marry any women of their choice. They have the right to build
their own Islamic Schools.
Muslims are eligible to acquire citizenship either
through naturalisation or by birth. Remember, non-Muslims in Saudi
Arabia have no such right,
Muslims enjoy full entitlement of proselytising
their religion and convert infidels into Islam. True to this
spirit, the Muslims in infidel lands are hell-bent to perform just
this-they would like to convert all the harami kafirs
in infidel countries to Islam.
Muslims living in the west can criticise other
religions (especially Christianity and Judaism) to the fullest
extent, but kafirs living in Muslim countries are legally
bound not to mention a single sentence which is critical of
pure, serene Islam-it is blasphemous and punishable by
death.
But all those rights enjoyed by the Muslims in
western countries are not enough for them. They want more. That is
why they perpetrate 9/11 on the innocent people of the USA. That
is why very few Muslims had ever criticised Bin Ladin's atrocities
on the western people. All those crimes of Bin Laden were holy
Islamic acts-in full agreement with the Islamic tenets. That is
why majority Muslims are Bin Ladin's supporters. Until today, I
have not heard any Imam in Saudi Arabia who had said Bin Ladin is
wrong. No Imam has, so far, declared Bin Ladin a non-Muslim or a
kafir. All Imams support him-if not openly, then secretly.
Being a native of Saudi Arabia and having lived here since my
birth, I can certainly vouch of what I say. I hear people's
(Saudi) conversation, and they are in praise of Bin Ladin's murder
of infidels. I watched on Television a famous Sheikh eulogising
Bin Laden, although the Sheikh admitted that Bin Ladin's actions
hurt the reputation of Saudi Arabia.
It is absolutely audacious for the Muslims to
criticise the French law banning religious symbols in French
public schools. Muslim's cry on this is nothing but the practice
of pure double-standard. They would not allow non-Muslims to
exercise their religious freedom in Islamic countries, but they
would expect the kafir lands to respect and uphold their
archaic religious (Islamic) symbolism. What sheer nonsensical and
hypocritical this demand could be, come to think of it!
To illustrate the utter menace of Islam that Europe
faces today, perhaps it would be germane to mention the killing of
artist/film director Van Gough in the Netherlands, who was
brutally murdered, in broad daylight, by an Islamist Jihadist. I
am very certain that in the coming months and years many such
murders will be committed by the Muslims living in Europe and
America. Many innocent western people will have to die in the
hands of Islam, just because they happen to be non-Muslims. I am
writing this because I am a Saudi and I know very well what Islam
is all about.
I understand that many readers are already aware of
the grave peril of Islam to the current civilisation, thanks to
the power of Internet. In fact, I did not write anything new. What
prompted me to warn the non-Muslims is that: last week I received
a number of e-mails listing the Danish products which I must
avoid. I see a great calamity is developing quite fast. I feel
that the world is about to face a crisis-a showdown between Islam
and the rest of the world. Those non-Muslims who still believe
that somewhere there is such a thing called 'peaceful' or
'moderate' Islam, this cartoon incident should be a wake-up call
to them.
It could be argued that the cartoons depicting
Muhammad might be offensive to some Muslims .This, to me, seems to
be fair enough. But then, the cartoons are the work of a single or
a few cartoonists or it might be a newspaper. Then, why should the
Muslim world punish the innocent people of Denmark? Is this a fair
treatment? When I ask this question to my friends they become very
angry. They told me that entire Europe is the enemy of Islam and
all Europeans deserve to be punished. It is because the Europeans
would never stop criticising Islam.
So, I told my friends that many Americans and
Europeans consider all Muslims to be terrorists-they must be
correct in their opinion. They (my friends) cannot refute me;
instead, they grow more irate. They even challenge me to be either
with them (Muslims) or with the infidels. But I am on neither
side. I am on the side of justice and fairness.
We criticise others, but then, we do worse than
what we are criticising. Truly, Muslims are dim-witted. They do
not realise that the USA and Europe could destroy the entire
Muslim population if they were to emulate the Islam's example of
apartheid, unfairness and absolute perpetration of hate towards
non-Muslims. The Muslims are very lucky that these infidels do not
imitate our policies.
Today, Muslims are seeking apology for a dead man (Muhammad) from
the government of Denmark.
My
question is: who really deserve an apology-Muslims or the
non-Muslims around the world?