Print
Hits: 13437

An excellent overview of Islamic brulity in Bosnia---from the Ottoman occupation through the WW II to the present day---and the West's willful amnesia about it.


The hidden “Islamic jihad” and dimensions of Bosnian war had been ignored prior to the conflict, during the civil war in the early 1990s, and afterwards. This misrepresentation of reality meant that the so-called democratic powers, the media and many leading academics served the ambitions of Al-Qaeda and other Islamic power that sent thousands of Islamists from all over the world to Bosnia.

According to many Western commentators, Bosnia was a tranquil nation where Muslims and Christians lived happily together for many centuries. Western rhetoric also claimed that it was the Muslim leadership in Bosnia which was open-minded, democratic, modernist, and which desired to maintain a multi-cultural and multi-religious society.

The truth could not have been further. Western commentators and academics are clearly glossing over the reality, because the Ottoman Empire was not based on enlightenment. On the contrary, the Islamization of Bosnia was paid by the blood of Christians and their enslavement, and forced conversions of young Christian boys to Islam via the barbaric devshirme system.

John R. Schindler stated in his book called Unholy Terror that “The most hated aspect of Ottoman rule in Bosnia, and the one whose memory lingers most sharply even today, was the practice of devshirme, the blood tax imposed on Christians. For three centuries beginning with the conquest of Bosnia, the Ottomans annually levied male children as tribute; every year, up to one-fifth of Christian boys in Bosnia – usually aged fourteen to twenty, but some were younger – were forcibly taken away from their families in contingents of a thousand and shipped to the imperial court at Istanbul to become warrior-slaves in the janissaries, the Sultan’s elite guard. They were converted to Islam….” (Unholy Terror, p. 23)

Christians of Bosnia faced pogroms, institutional discrimination, and a brutal system. If Christian men happened to fall in love with Muslim women, they faced the death penalty because it is forbidden in Islam; however, countless numbers of Christian women were kidnapped by Muslims, just like in modern-day Egypt and Pakistan, and the legal authorities deemed this permissible.

In fact, the myth of peaceful Islam in Bosnia could not be further from the truth because conditions for Christians in Bosnia was especially brutal because the landed elites who were Muslim, ruled over their Christian subjects with disdain. The Western hype of multi-cultural Bosnia is just that and in the middle of the 19th century you had around one hundred mosques in Sarajevo but only one Orthodox Christian church.

Non-Muslims suffered the fate of being dhimmis and converts to Islam used their power in order to maintain a system which supported every indignity that you could imagine. It was a policy based on the “superior Muslims” against the “enslaved Christians” and if the Christians did not accept dhimmitude, paying heavy taxes via jizya, and allowing young Christian boys to be converted to Islam and taken away to Istanbul, then the Islamic sword awaited them.

World War II also witnessed the mutual support of the Muslim elites with Nazi Germany and Orthodox Christians faced the brutality of many forces. This notably applies to the Croatian Catholic Ustasha regime which was genocidal towards the Serbian Orthodox Christians and it must be stated that Muslims participated fully within the military wing and police force of this brutal and barbaric regime. At the same time, Muslims served under the Nazi regime of Germany and the 13th Volunteer Mountain Division of the Waffen-SS (Handschar) was famous for killing Orthodox Christians.

John R. Schindler states that “Despite strong local support, Himmler’s Bosnian division ultimately did little to help the Nazi cause or defend the Bosnian Muslims… the 13th Division’s actual combat record was slight, while its depredations against unarmed Serbs were impressive; the Muslim troops spent more time killing and looting than actually fighting… the 13th Division ended the war ingloriously, plagued by war crimes and desertion.” (Unholy Terror, p. 36)

Islam's presence in Bosnia can be concisely summed up as thus: Brutal occupation of Christian Bosnia by the Islamic Ottoman Army, converting Christian boys to Islam by the barbaric devshirme system, killing Christian males for enslaving their women, no rights to Christians under law in cases involving Christians and Muslims, a brutal jizya tax system, the mass inequality of the dhimmitude system, Muslims joining forces with both the Ustasha fascist regime and the Nazi SS. And somehow, all this in the eyes of Western academics and journalists means ethnic and religious bliss to the nation.

If the same journalists and academics had vindicated Western European slavery of Africans in Africa, then the mass media would have ridiculed such disgraceful notions of history. However, the same mantra was used in order to vindicate the Muslim side in Bosnia during the 1990s.

The communist interlude in Yugoslavia certainly contained the Islamists in Bosnia but Muslim elites like Alija Izetbegovic were waiting in the wings and his pan-Islamic dreams for the Islamization of Bosnia and then further afield remained strong. When the conflict broke out in 1992, Western media remained silent about this and other future crimes by both Bosnian Islamists and international Islamic jihadists, who glorified in beheading Orthodox Christians and spreading a new Islamic jihad.

The hidden “Islamic jihad” in Bosnia was covered up, because this suited the needs of interested parties and it was not productive to show America, Alija Izetbegovic, Al-Qaeda, the global jihadist network and other nations working hand in hand. Therefore, the “Muslim victim card” was played up; history was re-written. The Serbians, who had been the victims of Islamic jihad under the Ottomans and then suffered so brutally under the Ustasha/Nazi/Islamic collaboration during World War II, were once more the victim. During the 1990s war, the media clearly sided with the anti-Serbian forces---namely the Croats, Bosnia Muslims and the Albanian Muslims of Kosovo.

In my article called Bosnia and Clinton’s Radical Islamists, I comment that

“Sky News has obtained clear and proper evidence of a major cover-up and footages of massacres against Serbian Christians have been seen. According to the investigation and footages which were shown, it is abundantly clear that thousands of radical Islamists from all over the world were given a free-reign in Bosnia.”

“This free-reign meant that innocent Serbian Christians were to meet terrible and disturbing deaths at the hands of radical Islamists who celebrated openly while cutting the heads off innocent civilians. The same Islamic forces which unleashed September 11th and which stone people to death in order to create “year zero,” were welcomed openly by ex-President Clinton and by people within his administration.”

Vojin Joksimovich in his book, Kosovo is Serbia, states that “Tudjman preferred Milosevic to Bosnian Muslims and their leader Alija Izetbegovic, whom he detested and described him as an Islamic fundamentalist with ambition to create an Islamic state in Europe. Needless to say, Washington and the Germans, as appeasers of radical Islam, did not allow Tudjman and Milosevic to proceed with their plan which would have avoided the war and associated sufferings.” (Kosovo is Serbia, p. 106)

Vojin Joksimovich also states that “During the war in Bosnia, Milosevic supported every single peace proposal for termination of the war, starting with the Vance-Owen plan in 1993 in contrast to President Clinton who undermined four peace proposals and thus extended the bloody conflict in an attempt to deliver victory to the Bosnian Muslims. Milosevic fired Milan Babic, Republic of Serbian Krajina president, for rejecting the Vance Plan for autonomy of Krajina which Milosevic considered acceptable.” (Kosovo is Serbia, p. 107)

However, for Muslim elites, the Bosnian conflict provided an opportunity and Alija Izetbegovic, who had ties with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and who openly admired Ayatollah Khomeini, saw an opening for Islam in Bosnia and his pan-Islamism meant that he ignored the Sunni-Shia divide.

Izetbegovic’s Islamic Declaration made it clear that he supported a pan-Islamic state which would include vast areas of land and link Europe with the Muslim world in the Middle East, Central Asia, North Africa, and to nations like Indonesia. In his views “There can be no peace or harmony between the ‘Islamic religion’ and non-Islamic social and political institutions.”

However, despite Izetbegovic having links with the Muslim Brotherhood and obtaining support from Iran in the 1980s during the height of Islamic crackdown against all forces of moderation in Iran---he somehow emerges under the wings of moderation during the Bosnian conflict. President Bill Clinton in the early 1990s was not concerned about Izetbegovic stating that “Islamic society without an Islamic government is incomplete and impotent.”

Before the war broke out in 1992, it is clear that the Muslim leader understood full well about which direction he wanted Bosnia to go. Izetbegovic visited Iran before the conflict erupted and asked for support. John R. Schindler comments that “Izetbegovic and his entourage, including his sons, were treated royally by the Iranians, the culmination of the Bosnian Islamists’ love affair with revolutionary Iran. They wanted Tehran’s help, and they received it. Izetbegovic asked Iranian leader Rafsanjani about the views of Iranian intelligence regarding the situation in Bosnia, regarding the risks of a war, and explicitly asked for Iranian “help” if hostilities broke out. The Bosnians were pleased when they were informed that they could count on Iran’s full support; they received blank checks…..” (Unholy Terror, p. 54)

There obviously has been whitewashing of the Muslim brutality and fascism in Bosnia, from its occupation by the Ottomans through to its role in World War II. In the 1990s, Alija Izetbegovic clearly had an Islamic vision for Bosnia and he spoke of the need for supporting all Muslims throughout the former Yugoslavia. At the same time, he was welcomed with open arms by Iran and he had links with the Muslim Brotherhood. However, this meant nothing to Bill Clinton and Al-Qaeda was given a free-reign in Bosnia by America and other forces which had vested interests.

Vojin Joksimovich in his book, The Revenge of the Prophet, highlights the role of Al-Qaeda, stating: “Osama Bin Laden saw a great opportunity in Bosnia and established a base of operations in Europe against Al Qaeda’s true enemy, the U.S. The Afghan Jihad and the Gulf War combined to produce fertile ground for 9/11. However, Bosnia became the direct springboard for 9/11, the Madrid train bombings and probably London.” (The Revenge of the Prophet, p. 298)

Just like the media's and academics' falsification of history, they, this time, ignored the present reality of Bosnia. Islamic jihadists were given the “green light” alongside terrorist networks and thousands entered Bosnia with the complicity of the Bosnian Muslim government and agencies which were serving Bill Clinton. The beheadings of Orthodox Christians by Islamists were not shown on television, nor the images of thousands of Islamists who were killing in the name of Allah. And of course, the real underdogs were the Bosnian Serbs, because they were fighting Bosnian Muslims, Croatians, Islamic jihadists, and covert military support and training from Western nations who were involved in murky dealings with nations like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and a host of other nations.

The Islamic agenda of Izetbegovic before the war was ignored, and then during the war, the media and academics, alongside political leaders, all developed collective amnesia. Memories of history remained strong but somehow the Orthodox Christians of Bosnia were meant to welcome their future “dhimmi” status if Izetbegovic’s dreams were to come true.

John R. Schindler states that “How the mujahidin, bin Laden’s holy warriors, came to Bosnia, were funded by corrupt Islamic financiers, and left their unfortunate mark on Europe is a tale of fanaticism, criminality, and violence that must be explained to understand the actual course of events in Bosnia during the war and after.” (Unholy Terror, p. 147)

El-Mujahid fighters in Bosnia and other Islamists enjoyed torturing Christian captives and beheading them and then sending these images to the internet. Just like Islamists have done after capturing Americans and other nationals in Iraq, Afghanistan and other parts of the world. However, for Bill Clinton and the Western media, this did not concern them because they had to highlight the "Muslim victim card". Yet, the same Americans, who were disgusted when Muslim jihadists did this to their nationals in Iraq, did not know that their own American government tolerated this during the war in Bosnia.

It is known that billions of dollars were sent to Bosnia in order to fund an Islamic jihad and Islamists entered Bosnia freely and with tacit support. John R. Schindler states that “Izetbegovic and SDA higher-ups mendaciously claimed to have no knowledge of el-Mujahid or any such units, a pleasant fraud that nobody in the West seemed interested in unmasking. Izetbegovic’s mid-November 1993 visit to the “el-jihad unit of the Army of Bosnia and Hercegovina” was reported by Sarajevo radio, including the president’s counsel to the holy warriors to “be merciless towards the enemy,” but none of the legion of Western journalists in the capital bothered to take note.” (Unholy Terror, p. 167)

Izetbegovic stated that “He who rises against Islam will reap nothing but hate and resistance” and the Bosnian Orthodox Christians knew full well that he was not interested in sharing power or a democratic nation which was based on pluralism. On the contrary Izetbegovic was warning the Christians to accept dhimmitude and Islamization. At the same time he welcomed support from the Muslim Brotherhood, international Islamists, Al-Qaeda, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Islamic channels via Sudan and other nations.

Izetbegovic also stated that “….In perspective, there is but one way out in sight: creation and gathering of a new intelligence which thinks and feels along Islamic lines. This intelligence would then raise the flag of the Islamic order and together with the Muslim masses embark into action to implement this order…..”

Chris Deliso, author of The Coming Balkan Caliphate: the Threat of Radical Islam to Europe and the West, comments that “…the proliferation of foreign-funded fundamentalist groups has challenged the power and legitimacy of traditional Balkan Muslim communities in unprecedented and often violent ways. Well-funded groups like the Saudi-backed Wahabbis continue to exploit internal schisms within local communities…”

Deliso add: “The direct relation between Bosnia as a localized jihad and Bosnia as a springboard for Islamist attacks in the West became felt almost immediately. Hundreds of foreign mujahedin, treated as heroes and presented with Bosnian passports after the war, were naturalized into the country, and were awarded their own enclaves ruled by Sharia law. Veterans of the Bosnian war who had seen it as just another in a series of jihad operations proved reluctant to settle down into rural ‘retirement,’ however. Failed terrorist attacks against the 1996 G-7 Summit in Lille, France and Los Angeles International Airport in December 1999 both involved veterans of Bosnia. Indeed, “five years before the sophisticated terrorist assault on the U.S.,” the Los Angeles Times would conclude in October of 2001, “the French were starting to uncover loosely linked violent networks spreading into several countries, all tied together by a common thread: Bosnia.”

“Most disturbingly, with the seminal attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington several individuals, including fundraisers, planners, and actual hijackers were associated with the Bosnian jihad. In addition, a tight-lipped CIA source also told the Washington Times on September 18, 2001 that there was a definite connection between the 9/11 plotters and Albania-based Islamic terrorists. Finally, a group of Albanian-American imams who had gleefully predicted the attacks the month before, and who had links with Kosovo Albanian organized crime structures, were briefly detained in Kosovo by UN police; however, they were inexplicably released. In November, 2007, it was revealed that some of the 9/11 hijackers had also been trained in Turkey, which despite being a secular Islamic state had also long been a two-way conveyor belt for international mujahedin and fundraisers active in both the Bosnian and Chechen jihads.”

It is clear that Muslim demographic factors will continue to alter the Balkan landscape, and alongside this will be major investments from Islamic nations, which desire to spread and create Islamic states in Europe. Added to this are Islamic terrorist cells and individuals, who were welcomed into Bosnia and Kosovo by local Muslim elites and by policy makers in Washington during the conflicts of Bosnia and Kosovo.

Policy makers in Washington now have a different agenda but more recent terrorist activity is evidence that the international Islamists have spread their ideology alongside Muslim elites in Bosnia who had an Islamic agenda. The “Muslim victim card” is still being used and this needs to be challenged, because the conflict in Bosnia was complex and the Bosnian Serb leadership faced a “hidden Islamic war” and a “covert war,” whereby international players openly manipulated the situation on the ground.

Serge Trifkovic (Srdja Trifkovic), the author of The Sword of the Prophet, states that “The American intervention in the Balkans – humanitarian bombings, multicultural Muslims, and all – was the Clinton team’s exercise in counter-realism. Its end result is the strengthening of an already aggressive Islamic base in the heart of Europe that will not go away.” (The Sword of the Prophet, p. 227)

John R. Schindler states that “Although Sarajevo’s supporters went to great lengths to deny it, there was no avoiding the reality that after 9/11, as al-Qaeda attacks multiplied across the world, a disturbing number of the terrorists involved had close ties to Bosnia and the holy war waged there. The dedicated cadres bin Laden had first nurtured in Afghanistan and brought to fruition in Bosnia were ready for the all-out confrontation with the “apostates” and “infidels” that al-Qaeda had promised.” (Unholy Terror, p. 296)

John R. Schindler continues by stating that “The role of the West in the fate of Bosnia cannot be underestimated. The willful blindness of Western elites, the dishonest and mendacious representations of Bosnia and its war presented by intellectuals, academics, entertainers and journalists, decisively influenced the course of the conflict, to the benefit of radical Islam.” (Unholy Terror, p. 324)

The events of Bosnia and the role of Izetbegovic and radical Islam did not fit the Western agenda and for multi-cultural media outlets which desired to maintain the “Muslim victim card myth”, which suited their quaint upbringings. Therefore, while the Serbians were being demonized the international Islamic brigade was slitting the throats of Orthodox Christians and they clearly had the blessing of Izetbegovic.

The ramifications of Bosnia continues and this applies to Islamic terrorist cells; Islamization funding projects by Bosnian Muslim elites alongside funding from Saudi Arabia and other Islamic nations; demographic factors; the “Muslim victim card” in order to radicalize Muslim youths; and other factors.

However, despite everything it appears that America is still intent on a unified Bosnia, whereby a Christian majority will be ruled by Muslim elites. Maybe the leadership in America could point to a nation, where non-Muslims welcomed being ruled by Muslims and what happened once they became ruled by Islamic Sharia law?

The Bosnian Serbs clearly cannot trust the international community because of its past deeds, and the ongoing reality of Kosovo where Orthodox Christians reside in fear and in the knowledge that many Orthodox Christian churches and monasteries have been destroyed.

The past reality of Islam in Bosnia means that you have no history of harmonious coexistence, because dhimmitude, jizya, pogroms, and the devshirme system was brutal. In Muslim-ruled Bosnia, there were a landed Muslim elite and an Orthodox Christian peasantry---the latter was taxed heavily in order to maintain Islamic power and control.

Overall, the distortions of past history and events during the war is one of international shame because the media bias was not only extreme, it was dangerous. Therefore, Islamists within the Bosnian elites were given a power base and they increased their power base by blocking any compromise and allowing thousands of Islamists from all over the world to enter Bosnia.

Today global Islamists and the followers of Izetbegovic are still dreaming about an Islamic state, and Saudi funding and other policies are intent on changing the Balkans. Islamists also hope to use the demographic factor in order to achieve this. Therefore, the Bosnian Serbs need either an independent state or to be allowed a referendum in order to join Serbia.

If not, the Serbs face another pogrom and ethnic cleansing---a reality can already be seen in today's Kosovo, where their culture, churches and community is under constant threat. The rich history of Orthodox Christianity in Kosovo faces a bleak future. If the Bosnian Serbs continue to wait or are forced by the international community to accept Bosnian centralization, then surely the same fate awaits them.