Once again, the ‘moderate’ Muslims are in the damage control. They are twisting, falsifying, sweet talking and using convoluted logic to frame that what the ‘meat’ Imam of Lakemba mosque in NSW, Australia said regarding the exposed ‘meat’ of infidel (I mean the white Australian women in particular) was just the Imam’s personal opinion and has nothing to do with Islam.

To gauge the deception and canard propagated by these ‘moderate’ Muslims let us search the Qur’an.

Let us read verse 33:59 from the Qur'an:

33: 59. O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies (i.e.screen themselves completely except the eyes or one eye to see the way). That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allâh is Ever Oft¬Forgiving, Most Merciful.

The most eminent tafsir writer, ibn Kathir comments on this verse:

Here Allah tells His Messenger to command the believing women -- especially his wives and daughters, because of their position of honor -- to draw their Jilbabs over their bodies, so that they will be distinct in their appearance from the women of the Jahiliyyah and from slave women. The Jilbab is a Rida', worn over the Khimar. This was the view of Ibn Mas`ud, `Ubaydah, Qatadah, Al-Hasan Al-Basri, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Ibrahim An-Nakha`i, `Ata' Al-Khurasani and others. It is like the Izar used today. Al-Jawhari said: "The Jilbab is the outer wrapper. `Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said that Allah commanded the believing women, when they went out of their houses for some need, to cover their faces from above their heads with the Jilbab, leaving only one eye showing. Muhammad bin Sirin said, "I asked `Ubaydah As-Salmani about the Ayah: (to draw their Jalabib over their bodies.) He covered his face and head, with just his left eye showing.'' (That will be better that they should be known so as not to be annoyed. ) means, if they do that, it will be known that they are free, and that they are not servants or whores.

Please read the last sentence once again. It reads:

[If they do that, it will be known that they are free, and that they are not servants or whores—ibn Kathir]

The above explanation of ibn Kathir means:

Muslim women must always keep their 'meat' covered whenever they venture out.

Infidel women who do not hide their 'meat' inside Jilbab and Hijab are either maid servants or whores.

The white Australian women who do not dress Islamically are maidservants or whores.
In Islam, Muslim men are allowed to have unlimited sexual intercourse with maid servants and/or sexual slaves. A Muslim man commits rape if and only if he has sex with a Muslim woman out of wedlock. Having forced sex with an infidel woman does not at all constitute rape, Islamically speaking.

The natural conclusion is that Muslim men are completely free to Islamically rape these infidel women, if these whores fall in Muslim men's hands.

There is no point in accusing this grand Imam of misrepresenting Islam. He knows Islam inside out. He is confident what he said is Islamically correct. The Qur'an backs him up one hundred percent, as explicated by none other than ibn Kathir. Blame the Qur'an before you blame this Sheik of Islam.

In fact, this ‘meat’ Imam, candidly explained his speech by saying that his reference of ‘meat’ was directed towards whores and prostitutes.

What he meant was very clear: white Australian women who dress scantily and provocatively (un Islamically) and venture into an Islamic territory, such as Lakemba, Auburn, Punch bowl, Granville (the Muslim suburbs of Sydney) are truly sluts and prostitutes and are perfectly suitable for Islamic rape. The Qur’an allows Muslim men to sexually molest these women, as they are no better than maid servants or prostitutes.