We had wished that this debate could
go a bit further. However, we regret to inform the readers that
we had to conclude the debate with Prof. Lammi's assertion that
he has made most of the points he had. He also informed us that
he has personal issues to attend. Here is latest conversation
between us and Prof Lammi:
--------------
Prof Lammi (17/04/2006)
Here is my last entry, which I would
like to entitle "thank you":
Every debate comes to a natural end
when the main points of contention have been aired, and after
that it tends to become repetitious. We have reached that
natural end. I've enjoyed our debate and I hope that others
have too, regardless of how they interpret its results. You
have treated me with integrity, and for that I thank you.
Sincerely yours, Walter Lammi
--------------
MA Khan (18 April, 2006)
Dear Prof. Lammi,
We understand that we could not
agree to discussion the few issues about Islam according to
the way mainstream Muslims view it. We also understand that
because this disagreement, our exchanges ending prematurely.
We regret again that we couldn't spare time for unheard
voice of Islam (Sufi/Moderate). We think we need to confront
and expose the Islam (the Islam Prophet had lived) for which
people are dying in dozens everyday because of the Islam.
Away from context and
interpretation, 2 other issues were kept for later analysis:
-
The way
Islam should be addressed - rejection, reformation etc.
-
The value Islam adds to humanity.
We are willing to delve into this area
so that readers can get a few points. If you are not
interested we will put an announcement to close the
discourse.
Yet, we agreed
or not, the readers have had an opportunity to listen to
views from both sides - an element sorely missing in
Islamic culture. This one of our aim too. Make Muslims
listen to arguments from both sides. Howsoever bitter and
emotive that might sound - they will slowly become less
and less sensitive to it with time. That's the way, you
can create tolerance amongst Muslims. This is our views.
Of course, there could be disagreements and alternative
views. Let them follow their school of thoughts.
Let us
assure you that you hold as much respect (if not more) from
us now as you held at the start.
We regret
that we might have argued on issues on the basis of points
you have put forward. Some of them might have sounded
unacceptable to you and we regret any such feeling caused.
For our part, we take no offense whatsoever. We take
everything as part of the debate and we felt happy that you
made some points and gave us the opportunity to discuss
them.
----------
Prof Lammi (19/04/2006)
Dear Mr. Khan,
No offense at all. I really
mean what I say about your exemplary integrity. But I think
that the debate is already quite long and I've expressed all
that I wanted to say, so it's a good time to end it. I
might mention that I also have a book manuscript (on an
entirely unrelated subject) that must be completed, so I am
no longer able to devote the time that this effort
requires.
Best wishes,