Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims

Muslims: The Most Kind, Loving, Loyal, Protective and Easily Offended People

Syed Soharwardy says Muslims are the kindest, most loving, most loyal, most protective people if allowed to practice their religion openly and freely. Also the most easily offended. No Christians need apply.

---

Some people are easily offended. Take the late Billy Martin—he didn’t like being called a cross-grained jackass. Preston Brooks once beat a man over the head with a cane for making casual remarks about his Uncle’s ties to slavery. Al Capone used a baseball bat on Hop Toad Giunta. The old Wild West gunslinger Wilson didn’t like being called a low-down, dirty Yankee liar. There was a comedian name Raymond J. Johnson who didn’t like being called ‘Johnson.’ “Oh, ya doesn’t has to call me Johnson,” he would say. ”You can call me Ray, or you can call me Jay, or you can call me Johnny, or you can call me Sonny, or you can call me Ray Jay, or you can call me R J, but ya doesn’t has to call me Johnson.”

Billy Martin, Preston Brooks, Al Capone, Wilson…it didn’t take much to offend them but compared to Syed Soharwardy, the most easily offended person in all of Canada, they were models of patience and composure—no hair pulling or drooling. Soharwardy is more like Raymond J. Johnson. Capone shrugged off the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre—it was just one of those things; Soharwardy was so offended by the murder of Aqsa Parvez he threatened to go on a hunger strike. “The murder was absolutely un-Islamic,” he said. “We must not be using religion as a scapegoat to justify what we need. We should resolve our disputes based on reasoning, logic and cool-mindedness.” If Capone had been thinking like Soharwardy he would have blamed the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre on Eliot Ness. Booze, he would have said, had nothing to do with the murders. We must not use booze as a scapegoat. Soharwardy uses Islamophobia as a scapegoat. (Capone used reason, logic and cool-mindedness to resolve his dispute with Bugs Moran)

Scarcely days had passed before Soharwardy saw something on the Internet that infuriated him. It was so Islamophobic, so anti-Muslim, he just had to speak up! It was worse than Hamas Mouse arming 10-year-old Palestinians to kill Jews! Obviously someone had carried free speech too far! An Internet blogger had written, “There is no such thing as an innocent Muslim…They must all be killed. All of them.” Soharwardy was incensed. Islam was a religion of peace and toleration, but there were limits to toleration—even to Islamic toleration! Things could occasionally get out of hand. Look what had happened in Sudan…in Darfur…in Beslan…in Smyrna…in Bali…in Kosovo…in Amsterdam…Limits had been reached; believers had been pushed to an extreme. There are times when something has to be done to protect Islam from Kafirs and Infidels.

Syed was born in Karachi. He was trained as an Imam in Saudi Barbaria. He is national president of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada and founder of Muslims Against Terrorism. He defines terrorism as attacks on innocent civilian populations like those carried out by the Bush Administration on Iraq and Afghanistan, ignoring the fact that most of the civilian casualties have been the result of terrorist activities—a terrorism he refuses to acknowledge.

“I assure you,” he says, “if a Muslim is allowed to practice Islam openly and freely and the society does not discriminate against him/her for being openly Muslim, then the Muslim will love that society and will help in protecting the religious rights of the followers of other religions.”

Qur’an 9:29 “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or the Last Day, who do not forbid that which is forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, or acknowledge the Religion of Truth (Islam), (even if they are) People of the Book (Christians and Jews), until they pay the Jizyah tribute tax in submission, feeling themselves brought low.” (Another interpretation: “…pay the tax in acknowledgement of our superiority and their state of subjection)

Tabari VIII:130 “The Messenger said, ‘Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian peninsula. ‘Uman investigated the matter, then sent to the Jews, saying, ‘Allah has given permission for you to be expelled.’”

Qur’an 48:28 “It is He Who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the Religion of Truth (Islam) that he may make it superior to every other religion, exalting it over theirs. Allah is a sufficient witness. Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah. Those who are with him are severe with Infidel unbelievers.”

If Muslims are allowed to practice their religion openly and freely they will love that society and will help protect the religions of the followers of other religions. And how will they do that? It’s a bit complicated and difficult for a non-Muslim to comprehend. First the ‘protected’ religion must be brought low, feel itself subdued and pay the Jizyah tribute tax in submission. And there is that severe thing.

Sowarhardy is tiresome—worse than tiresome. If only the Nazis had been allowed to practice their politics openly and freely…Except for the dead gangsters, Muslims Against Terrorism make Al Capone and the capo di tuttis seem reasonable, logical and cool-minded.

Qur’an 4:114 “He who disobeys the Apostle after guidance has been revealed will burn in Hell.”

George W. Bush and Benedict XVI have been offered guidance. Theo van Gogh was not. It depends on the size of the bodyguard.

Soharwardy says, “A true practice of Islam develops a kind and loving person. Maybe…somewhere… But the kind and loving person Syed is talking about, if it has any existence outside of Islam, is not much in evidence in Saudi Barbaria or Iran or in any section of the universe where Muslims outnumber Infidels, Kafirs and dogs. The Qur’an says those who believe in the Holy Trinity (The Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost) will suffer a painful doom. Acceptance of such folderol is not likely to develop kind and loving persons.

Soharwardy is a first-class blowhard. He is so full of silly statements it is difficult to take him seriously, yet like Herr Joachim von Ribbentrop he offers a forecast of the future. With less knowledge of the US Constitution than a mule has of the Ten Commandments, he offered this analysis of American history: “Separation of church and state was required in the west because the church was abusing ordinary citizens in the name of the Christian faith.” Can Christians and Muslims get along? “In holy Qur’an, chapter 30, Allah favored Christians over pagans and gave them victory over their enemies.” “The US government or the US media has no right to declare anyone as terrorists or part of an ‘axis of evil.” (Non-Islamic sovereignty does not exist anywhere in the world!)

Soharwardy listed six things a Muslim must not do at any time, including during Jihad. One: Kill or hurt women and children even if they are of the enemy. Two: Kill the sick and elderly even if they are of the enemy. Three: Do not destroy hospitals. Four: Do not cut down green trees. Five: Do not contaminate water sources. Six: Do not destroy the places of worship of other religions. The best that can be said is they no longer cut down green trees. Yet Soharwardy says, “Where else do we find these great ethics during war time except in a religion founded over 1400 years ago—that of peace loving Islam.”

Beslan…Bali…9/11…Smyrna…Darfur…Sudan…Indonesia…Cyprus…It is easy to get very tired of this drivel. Five minutes of Soharwardy would be worse than listening non-stop to every speech delivered by FDR from 1910 to 1945. Drivel…drivel…drivel…

If one takes into account ‘collective guilt,’ the Internet blogger that angered Soharwardy was correct when he wrote, “There is no such thing as an innocent Muslim.” There were no innocent Nazis, there were no innocent Americans in the USA in the spring of 1861 and the crimes of Islam are every bit as great as those of Hitler and substantially greater than those of Jeff Davis. The blogger, however, was wrong in his solution. Conversion or at least reformation is the answer. Islam’s crimes should be exposed—constantly—without end. Quote the Qur’an—beat them over the head with their own scripture, it may not be what they want but it is what they need.

And never stop.

 

If you like this essay: Stumble it   Stumble Upon Toolbar digg it reddit

Denis Schulz was prospective convert to Islam (read his testimony: How I Almost Became a Muslim?) before changing his mind after the 9/11. He actively writes on the threats of Islam and terrorism.


Name:    closed
Comment:

Comments Notes: Keep comments short. Our system cannot separate paragraphs. Comments must be relevant to the topic of the article. We did not regulate the comments but if irrelevant comments, materials, adds of other websites etc. are being uploaded, we will have to regulate the comments and even ban the IP addresses of such nuisance posters.


Name: vbv
Date: Thursday January 03, 2008
Time: 02:35:58 -0700

Comment

Muslims like to carry the "permanently hurt/offended sentiment" to just gain advantage over non-muslims in pushing their rotten agenda to "islamise the world" with dire threats and unmitigated violence! Sheer barbarians living in the dark hole of 'backwardness and stupidity' want to take the whole world into that misery called 'islam' , destroying all the progress made by the 'kaafirs' in sheer jealousy and poisonous envy! They rejoice in misery , like in Afghanistan/Saudi Arabia/ Sudan/ Pakistan / Iraq / Iran / Palestine / Bangladesh , et al - all great examples of 'islamic' civilisation with the poorest record of human rights and also the lowest index of human development! Just over a week back Benazir Bhuto was brutally assassinated , a woman in Saudi Arabia is awarded 200 lashes for being alone with a 'un-related man', hands and legs chopped for thieving,stoning to death for 'alleged adultery', butchery for 'blaspheming' islam/Muhamad/Allah, etc. With such barbaric practices what can you expect rather than feigned "hurt sentiments phobia" to cover up all these barbaric and uncivilised practices under the name of 'Sharia'/ Quran! Just imagine the condition of the world's humanity if islam were to succeed. Surely human extinction is well assured ,especially if these fanatics lay their hands on WMD like nuclear weapons/Chemical weapons/biological weapons. It is a sure recipe for immediate destruction of humanity- this is what comes out of the shit called islam and madcap muslims hollering in a fanatic frenzy "Allah u akabar"!!!

 It is a lunatic creed banning music, art ,dance, TV, motion pictures, partying, reveling,or any kind of expression that would show humans exulting in sheer joy! Only the howling 'azan' is music to these fanatics and bigots!! All forms of comforts/entertainments coming out of 'kaafirs' inventions are "haram" ,but all weaponry is "halal". What rotten logic? Human life is of no value , especially if you were to criticize Muhamad- the world's first terorist! It is hightime that the West should rip the masks of these dangerous hypocrites if any civilization is to survive in this world - and islam is certainly not a civilization but just abarbaric cult revolving around one 7th century barbarian and a moral wreck called 'Muhamad'!


Name:
Date: Thursday January 03, 2008
Time: 08:23:20 -0700

Comment

killing for not wearing hejab is not islamic !!!!!!!!!! if it happened and a woman in islamic society refused to wear it she is treated as not less than a prostitute. she always have the choice either to wear it or get divorced. and many cases if she refuse and agree for divorce the husband refuse to divorce and kick her out without divorce. nothing in the mind of a muslim man who find everything in the world haram other than irritating his wife and add more restrictions to her because in muslim cult marriage is a property contract, also he will be punished for his wife sins in the afterlife. thus the social life there is nothing more than hell.


Name: U.K. TODAY.
Date: Thursday January 03, 2008
Time: 18:32:46 -0700

Comment

I often wonder if the Marxist mayor of London and dhimmi supreme, the horrendous Ken Livingstone has been offered "Guidance by the apostle". I understand that prominent Islamic leaders around the U.K. have urged their "Ummah", to vote him into power at the forthcoming elections. --- This leads me to a question gnawing away at my very soul. --- What is it about Marxism and Islam???.--- What, other than a loathing of democracy do they have in common???. --- Does the Marxist Livingstone really believe that he would command a voice in an Islamic state???. --- For decades, Livingstone and fellow "Trot" Gerry Gable, shared platforms around the country with their - Marxism Today, - Socialist workers Party, - Red action, - C.N.D,. - and Searchlight gatherings. They agreed and supported any far left crusade or crackpot scheme known to man. --- but today!!!. --- Gerry Gable is a Jew and Zionist. --- Therefore, he has seemingly been "purged" from the future of the great Islamo - Marxist alliance. I wonder how he feels as he watches former "Brother" Livingstone, march through the streets of London, arm in arm with his new Islamic cohorts screaming "WE ARE ALL HIZBOHLAR NOW". --- INTEGRITY. --- WHAT INTEGRITY???. Livingstone and his ilk are fools, traitors and cowards to not just their own people, but the rest of mankind!!!.


Name: allat
Date: Thursday January 03, 2008
Time: 20:14:52 -0700

Comment

"worse than listening non-stop to every speech delivered by FDR from 1910 to 1945. Drivel…drivel…drivel… ' Is that worse than being forced to gather in from of the plaza and listen to Castro deliver his 5 hr., 8 hr speeches? ;)


Name: G
Date: Tuesday January 08, 2008
Time: 08:28:42 -0700

Comment

Great article bro. hope more will understand the truth


Name: ArabianPrincess
Date: Sunday April 06, 2008
Time: 17:57:56 -0700

Comment

Muslims are always offended. Sheesh get a box of tampons.


 
Hit Counter