Islam
Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims
Response to 'Haseeb Shad's complaint to
Ayesha Ahmed's
"A Complaint to Allah"'
20 Apr, 2006
- [A Muslim brother Haseeb Shad sent us a complaint to one of Ayesha Ahmed's article, A Complaint to Allah, in our archive. We had forwarded the complaint to Ms Ahmed and she did not have time to respond to it. I have tried to address some of Mr. Shad's complaints. -MA Khan]
|
- Dear Mr. Shad,
- Your assertion that with time, people live shorter life is not quite true. Some mythical stories from the religious books does not necessarily hold true. It requires proof. The scientific proof is that the longevity of human being is increasing in recent times as higher economic affluence, healthcare and scientific insight into dietary science and physical system improves. The recent rise in longevity has even become an economic problem in wealthy countries of Europe, China, Japan etc. because of the need for feeding and supporting an increasing aged and less productive population. Once again, all scientific proofs suggest people never lived hundreds of years as claimed in the alleged books of divine revelations. Humans live longest in recent times than any time before.
|
- The Prophet did not bring a lot of people to the fold of Islam. Yes, with the sword, he brought a good number of people of Southern Arabia before his death. But Southern Arabia is only a small dot in the entire globe. Yet, he probably had slaughtered and exiled more people than what he got as true converts. In fact, majority of the Muslims had professed to Islam due to the fear of sword of Prophet Muhammad. Most of the Muslims quickly sought to leave Islam after his death thinking that the fear of the sword has died with the Prophet's death. Prophet's first biographer ibn Ishak writes, "When the apostle was dead, most of the Muslims thought of withdrawing from Islam and had made up their mind to do so". Many tribes rose in rejection of Islam, turned to their tribal leaders and rejected to pay taxes to Muslim authority. The first Caliph Abu Bakr had to wage a bitter war with many fierce and recalcitrant tribes in order to bring them back to Islam after a blood-letting war (popularly known as the Battle of Ridda) under the commandership of brutal and bloodthirsty general Khalid ibn Walid.
- What you see of Islam today is not Muhammad's single-handed contribution. Much credit must go to his successors. Caliph Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Ali and subsequent caliphs and Sultans continued to use of sword initiated by the Prophet Muhammad to spread Islam through immense blood-bath, barbarity & cruelty from Europe to Africa, from Arabia to India. If not for campaign of swords kept active usage for centuries after Muhammad's death, Islam would have died in the desert not long after Muhammad's death - given the way Muslims had started leaving Islam immediately after his death.
|
- Allah wants the entire world enslaved to his whims and cruelty - which you call perfect religion. But Muhammad could not convert even 0.1% of the population of his time to Islam.
|
- This is another cock and bull story. Human beings were never that tall and large. Not only human beings live longest now, they are also becoming increasingly taller with greater prosperity and nutritious diet. All fossil evidences suggest our ancestors thousands of years ago were shorter than modern humans.
- Once again, stories of the Bible, Koran do not necessarily hold true. They are like grandma stories of ghosts, devils etc. Such claims require scientific evidences which are not in favor of those mythical stories.
|
- Mr. Haseeb, this is another cock and bull story which is not supported by evidence on the ground. If there was wide-spread killing of female babies, there would have been severe shortage of women in Arabia at Muhammad's time. But we do not see any such evidence. We do not see any evidence of men living without getting married because there are not enough women because of wide-spread female infanticide. Instead, we see Muhammad and his gangs having multiple women plus unaccounted number of sex-slaves - captured in raids or bought from the market. There appears a surplus of women - definitely not a shortage.
- Having said that, I agree there might have been limited infanticide of female. Daughters are still less preferred by parents in most Muslim countries. Daughters are still considered a burden to Muslim parents in countries like India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and probably more in other Muslim countries. Yet, daughters are well valued in Japan, Singapore, South Korea and all Western countries - as good as equal to sons. In most Muslim countries, female children continue to be looked down upon.
|
- This is a rubbish claim. Muhammad killed many people who opposed his preaching and criticized his dogma. One case is Abu Afak, a 120 year-old man. He composed poetry criticizing Muhammad's revelation - so Muhammad ordered his assassination. There are numerous stories of Muhammad's killing apostates and critics. He killed all of 600-900 surrendered men of able age of the Quraiza clan.
- Read more on Muhammad's assassinations: Assassinations -Ali Sina
- Slaughter and enslavement of Banu Quraiza: The Invasion of Banu Qainuqa
|
- This story again is baseless. In 619 Muhammad went to Mecca to find a new sanctuary. He had already insulted the Tayifites' chief deity, Allat in the Koranic verses and preaching in Mecca. Yet, the Tayifites did not resist his stepping into their community. However, once there ??? he asked people of Tayif to leave their false religion and to accept Islam. Can anyone guess what will happen if a Christian from a distant community go to Mecca, Jerusalem or any main city in Pakistan and insist that Islam is false and ask the Muslims to accept Christianity today. Can Mr. Haseeb tell us what fate that Christian man would face even today world of tolerance and human progress?
- Muhammad also sought to incite Tayifites' rivalry against Meccans on whom the Tayifites heavily depended for trades. Yet, Muhammad was allowed to stay there for 10 days and when his pestering preaching became too annoying ??? the tribal elders order him out of Mecca. Given that the Tayifites did not harm Muhammad for 10 days, it is unlikely they gave too bad a treatment as Muslims claim.
- But Muhammad tried to take his revenge. When Muhammad was returning to Medina after conquering Mecca with 12000 of his army, he had attacked the Tayif community in revenge. But the Taifites from a vantage position counter-attacked with archery and killed 12 of Muhammad's men. Seeing no hope of breaking through the wall of the Tayif enclave against the deadly archery attack of the Tayifites, Muhammad order despoliation of the Tayif orchards and vineyards, which were lying outside their enclave. However, in a few months' time, Tayites realized that it was impossible for them not to submit to Muhammad and under the mediation of Tayif chief Orwa ibn Masud, son-in-law of Abu Sufian (Muhammad too was a son-in-law of Abu Sufian), the Tayifites submitted to Muhammad.
MA Khan is the editor of islam-watch.org website.