Introduction

This year (i.e. 2006) exactly 1436 years after the initiation of Islam in a desert country populated by sex-hungry, war-mongering and male-dominated people, I find a very interesting debate on “Rasul”. Some people are slowly raising their voices claiming that they are no more willing to accept “Mohammad” as the Rasul of Allah. Some are even proposing man like Prof. Dr. Yunus as Rasul. I find the debate extremely interesting, logical and healthy. I wonder, how could our forefathers fail to understand that “Mohammad’s character” as vividly pictured in the holy book can in no way be accepted as the ‘life of a good man’, not to say anything about the rasul of Allah.

I discover that the question has been raised by the Bangalees, which seems to me as quite natural and logical. After all, the Bangalees are more intelligent than the Pakistanis and the savage Arabs. Being “sex-hungry, war-mongering and male-dominated” the people of the Arab peninsula are by nature great admirer of heroes rich in sex, wives and food. It is natural that the religion that can show dreams of these items in the heaven and reality on earth through snatching women from the opponents (where all persons belonging to other religions were known as opponents) would attract the Arabs. The Pakistanis also have similar mentality. So they also liked it. The earlier generations of the Bangalees liked it, or probably were compelled to like it because they were hated by others. Now as days are going on and they are getting the scope of reading the holy book in languages understandable to them, they clearly feel, even though Allah is great, a man with that moral character can in no way be accepted as Rasul.

RASUL AND MUSLIM MORALITY:

It is now openly discussed all over the world among the non-Muslims and the non-Arab Muslims that most, if not all, of the immoral qualities the Muslims acquire originated in from Mohammad’s character as written in the holy book. Probably the Bangalee Muslims can understand the difference more clearly. Living in the same land with the Hindus and having primary knowledge of Hindu Buddhist mythologies they know, there are mentions of both moral and immoral (and ugly) activities in these mythologies. However, the final learning is, those who were engaged in that ugly types were punished either in this world or in the world after death. In fact the “MENTION OF THE UGLIEST ACTIVITIES” in religious books were done in order to have positive affect or in other words, to influence the followers in the right direction. By knowing those they realize that those were never liked by the almighty god. But what may happen to the followers when they  discovers that “the person engaged in such immoral activities was considered by Allah as his dearest friend or the ever best man of the world” ?  I know, the intelligent section of the people would at once reject the suggestion by saying that the man (claimed as rasul) ‘fabricated those for his personal benefit”. The people with minimum intelligence would realize, such a learning is sure to generate ‘immoral qualities among the followers”. The Muslim-world is now suffering from the evil effects of these teachings. The world cannot expect moral qualities from the Muslims till they “dissociate the man with immoral character from their religion, i.e. rashul-ship”. The earlier the Muslims understand that “a man with the character of Mohammad (treated as Rasul) is the root-cause of immorality of the Muslims all over the world”  the better will be their position in this world.

MORALITY OF RASUL REVEALED IN THE HOLY BOOK:

In the holy book the character of Muhammad (mentioned as Rasul) has been pictured as one of the worst. What morality can you find in the character of a man :
(i) Who is caught red-handed by his wife while having relation with the maid servant ?
(ii) Who threatens his wife for disturbing in such a noble (?) mission ?
(iii) Who discovers that his wife might have passed a night with a man (which might have been endorsed by the two camel men, thus making 3 witness) and hence prescribes that in such a situation four males will be required to prove the offense, such that his wife may not get suffer from the consequences ?
(iv) Who marries the wife of his son ?

If one endeavors to prove that the general character of males in that age was like that he is wrong. The characters of other prominent men of that age like Ali, Osman, Omar, Abu Bakar etc. were quite nice and acceptable even by today’s standard.

Taslima Nasreen wrote about case number (i) & (ii) and got threat from the Islamic pundits. But there was no way for the pundits to say that it was wrong, because everything is so clearly inscribed in the holy book. Rushdie wrote about case number (iii) and was equally threatened. But this time also no one dared to challenge because all are inscribed in the book. Writers did not write anything about case number (iv) because it is simply animalistic to take place in the human society.

AFFECT OF THE ‘RASUL EPISODE’ ON THE PEOPLE OF VARIOUS REGIONS:

Now we shall see how rasul’s character affected the people of various regions of the world. Since people of various regions differ in mentality and social attitude, it is natural that the above teachings would affect them differently. We mention the following prominent types :

(a) THE SHEIKHS: The Arab Muslims can understand the holy book better because it has been written in their mother tongue and in the context of their land. We have already mentioned that they are in general sex, money and meat hungry. The Arabs easily understand the porno-qualities in connection with Mohammad’s life, discuss those with friends, wives, maid-servants and concubines and heavily enjoy those. Foreigners working under such Sheikhs need to share wives if they are nice looking. Since their husbands work under them the Sheikhs consider such wives as their maid servant and believe enjoying them lawful.

(b) TALIBAN and AL QUAIDA: Blind faith followed through many generations turn people non-intelligent and make them strongly inclined to those faiths. Also they cannot tolerate any criticism of those by any corner. In case they sense any, they turn ferocious. While the Sheikhs are endeavoring to create such groups every where, Al Quaida is their best production. In their “strong determination intrigued by blind faith” they targeted the destruction of the Twin tower, Pentagon and White house. They were helped by the agents of their ‘real enemies’ in USA. Because of their low intelligence level they could not even understand that such act would make them ‘enemies’ of the non-Muslim world. But the inevitable thing happened and now their religious brethren all over the world are suffering from the natural consequences.

(c) INNOCENT VICTIMS: The non-Arab people who accepted or were compelled to accept this religion without having a chance to know what was written in the holy book became the innocent victims of the situation. During the first few generations they followed this religion as per direction of their ancestors. But in this age of science and uninterrupted knowledge they became inquisitive to know what was written in the holy book. There was no dearth of authentic translations. As soon as they went through those they could not believe their eyes. They became confused regarding the following :

(i) They were aware that the holy book contained the holy lessons given by God to ‘rasul’ for the benefit of men and those were sent through the heavenly messenger, Zibrail. But what made God to narrate those ‘ugly personal conjugal family matters of Mohammad’ to Mohammad and to tell him to include in the book to be followed by God’s followers ?

(ii) The holy book reveals what type of a man Mohammad was. Could not the great God find a man of better character as his rasul, when he was aware that this rasul was to stand as “sacred idol” for the human society ?

Since they are intelligent and follow this religion only for a few centuries (the Arabs follow if for over 15 centuries, while the Indians, for 3 or 4 centuries only) the could easily realize reveal that :

(i) Mohammad in fact preached stories rich in sex and enjoyment with the hope that the sex hungry Arabs would swallow those. He was correct, the Arabs accepted the juicy stories. They did not even think for a while that Muhammad’s personal sex life cannot be a matter for God to preach publicly and that if God wanted to have a good man as rasul, there was no dearth of such men in this world.

(ii) In spite of great inconsistencies, the Arabs accepted his preaching because they could realize that by using it they could form strong army by combining their blind faith in religion and attraction for sex and wealth and could conquer the world. When the soldiers were informed that as soon as the enemies would be defeated, all their wealth and women would become their properties to enjoy, they in fact turn to sex-mad dogs. They were also informed that they won’t have to marry these women and could throw away after enjoyment. Mohammad prescribed that they could kick out their own wives anytime they wished by pronouncing few words. In his dream to conquer the world Mohammad even failed to realize that human society was composed of both men and women. He placed little importance on women since, by his considerations the women could not be used as combat soldiers.

After the above realization, the intelligent group of followers turned to Silent protesters. The Silent Protestors (for obvious reason, most of them are women) found absolutely no reason to keep faith on those fictitious things. But they did not get the courage to revolt against the tightly-knit Islamic society. So, they accepted an alternate policy. For them five times prayer turned to be the matter of ‘observance only if watched by others’. Even when they observed, the prayer turned to a ‘sitting and standing business’ with usual thoughts in mind. For them the Eids turned to festivals to eat and drink. They could not change the rituals at death, because no alternative to it prevails in the society. These Silent protestors in fact follow no religion, but pretend to follow Islam in order to avoid public resistance in their own society. They have no headache for Muhammad as rasul or anything, because it no more matters them. In non-Muslim societies they act as complete non-believers. Another group of innocent victims continue following religion merely as “continuation of the teaching of the forefathers”, but they carefully avoid Muhammad as rasul.

(c) THE MULLAHS:  The section of the Indian and Bangladeshi Muslims who take religion as the most important part of life and source of earning (Imams, religious preachers, students and teachers of religious schools etc.) knows everything about Allah and Rasul. Even though they have language constraints, they know better because of their over culture of the subject. Culture of various controversial activities of rasul results in long discussion, narration, argument and counter-argument on sex. In fact this one is the thing that makes religion most attractive to them. Most of such persons are considered to have no moral character. There are numerous cases of molestation of young women and even minor girls (marriage of a 6 year old girl act as their inspiration) by the Islamic teachers.

(d) RAJAKARS: When the religious schools continuously culture the stories of sex, piousness in killing the enemies (non-Muslims), heavenly prizes in return of enjoying non-believer women etc., in Bangladesh they turn to what is known as “Rajakar of 1971”. Even though there are other religious groups like Hindu, Christian, Buddhist etc., all, I repeat, all the Rajakars belong to Muslim religion only. Since the messengers of other religions have good moral character, the followers strive to maintain the same.

CONCLUSION:

There is absolutely no reason for the Muslims to have good moral character till they abandon following a rasul of that morality. But we know, still there are Muslims with excellent moral character. You can be sure, the lone quality of these Muslims is, “they totally disbelieve a man with Mohammad’s character as rasul” and hence do not try to imitate his character. On the other hand, those who believe Mohammad as rasul, naturally feel the urge to follow him and his character and turn to Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Rajakar etc. They feel pride to enjoy women of other religions, to enjoy young women in the status of cousin, father’s or mother’s sisters etc., not to say anything about their minor students. They feel it a pride to destroy other people’s creation even at the cost of their lives. They do not even understand that after such destruction there will be numerous young Muslims standing in queue and waiting for permission to visit the developed countries for higher studies, only to be rejected on the ground of being Muslims.

Even though numerous good Muslims (naturally they do not accept Muhammad as Rasul) are of excellent character and mentality, they are treated equally like the Rajakar, Taliban and Al Quaida, simply because both groups have a common religious book. The only way for the good Muslims to dissociate themselves from the others is to have a holy book that would not contain the nasty stories of Mohammad, but would only express the deliberations of Allah.

ONE REQUEST:
USA is spending billions in Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries in quest of good Muslims. If their mission is to use up and thus to make good market for war weapons produced by their manufacturers, then their failures in such missions may be taken as great success. In that case we have nothing to say. But if USA wants a peaceful world, which will be possible only with the good Muslims, they can do it by spending only few millions. This can be done by separating the good Muslims from the rest. For this reason USA need to arrange an international convention  where they can invite the Muslim scholars from all over the world and discus about the affect of the character of the rasul on that of the crooked Muslims. In such conference the stories (good or bad no question) of the rasul will be discussed in minute details. It is natural that such discussions would make the good Muslims (who do not accept Muhammad as rasul) to feel the necessity of a “holy book without unholy matters”. No one should have any doubt that great Allah cannot be so bad as to convey those nasty stories through the heavenly messenger. As soon as such a book is written the good Muslims can separate themselves from the other Muslims by claiming that they follow Islam where there is no nasty rasul. As soon as they would abandon following the nasty life of that man, the world would come to know how excellent-charactered the Muslims can be. We eagerly wait to see that day. And we request USA to take such a step in the greater interest of themselves and the entire world.

Since USA is the worst sufferer of Islamic terrorism, they deserve the right to arrange such a convention and raise the following questions:
1.  Where As All Religions Of The World Use Men Of Morality As Messenger Of God, What Made Allah To Choose A Man Of That Character As His Messenger?
2.  Was The Character And Qualities Of The Muslims Affected By The Life And Character Of This Messenger?
3.  How Can The Honest And Good-Morality Muslims Dissociate Themselves From The Other Muslims?

We believe, in their mission to save this world from Islamic terrorism and to save numerous innocent Muslims from harassment USA would take proper steps to arrange the above mentioned international convention at their earliest.

---

Source: www.annomot.com