During a recent interview on British Television, Benjamin
Netanyahu was asked "How come so many more Lebanese have been
killed [in the conflict with Hezbollah] than Israelis?"
Netanyahu's reply: ".. in World War II more Germans were killed
than British and Americans combined, but there is no doubt in
anyone's mind that the war was caused by Germany's aggression. And
in response to the German blitz on London, the British wiped out
the entire city of Dresden, burning to death more German civilians
than the number of people killed in Hiroshima. Moreover, I could
remind you that in 1944, when the R.A.F. tried to bomb the Gestapo
Headquarters in Copenhagen, some of the bombs missed their target
and fell on a Danish children's hospital, killing 83 little
children. Perhaps you have another question?"
How humiliating. Poor interviewer.
The humiliation was entirely deserved, however. Had the
interviewer not been so inadequate he would not have asked such a
silly question. On the subject of casualties, he would indeed have
asked another question. A better question.
What the interviewer ought to have asked is this: How is it that
Hezbollah, considered a terrorist targeter of innocent civilians,
killed more Israeli soldiers than Israeli civilians – whereas the
top-notch I.D.F. military, although claiming to avoid targeting
innocent civilians, wound up killing more Lebanese civilians than
Hezbollah combatants? Why should we not conclude, by the numbers,
that I.D.F. is the terrorist organization – and that Hezbollah is
the legitimate military?
Now that would have been a question worth asking. And I don't know
what Netanyahu's answer would have been. But I do know that
answering this question is critical. Even though nobody asked.
How is it that terrorist Hezbollah killed more Israeli soldiers
than civilians? For sure not for lack of trying to kill Israeli
civilians. Hezbollah did its utmost, but it has proven itself
incompetent at killing Israeli civilians. It shot, what? 4000
Katyushas into Israel? And it managed to wound or kill less than
1000 Israelis. That's total incompetence. It takes Hezbollah at
least 4 Katyushas to manage wounding or killing one Israeli
civilian.
Doesn't mean, of course, that Israel didn't suffer heavy civilian
casualties – but it was due to the sheer number of Katyushas
Hezbollah fired at Israel. Firing 4000 Katyushas, some are bound
to hit targets. But the sheer number of Katyushas fired reflect
the competence of Hezbollah's Katyusha suppliers – Iran and Syria
– and underscore the incompetence of Hezbollah firing the
Katyushas supplied to them. Put it this way: in Israel, three
times more bushes were hit by Hezbollah than civilians.
So, as much as Hezbollah targets Israeli civilians, it is 3 times
better at killing bushes. Burning bushes everywhere. Incompetent.
But how, then, did Hezbollah manage to kill more Israeli soldiers?
And how is it that I.D.F. wound up killing more Lebanese civilians
than Hezbollah combatants?
The answer to these questions is in how and where Hezbollah shoots
from.
Hezbollah shoots at Israel right from the homes, schools and
hospitals of Lebanese civilians.
And Hezbollah has bunkers. Great bunkers. Terrific bunkers. Deep
concrete bunkers. Interconnected with tunnels. Bunkers and tunnels
they've been digging the past 10 years.
Clever. As if they knew this day was coming 10 years ago.
So, of course, after Hezbollah shoots at Israel, they duck to
their bunkers again. And then it's hard for Israel to hit them
when shooting back.
Almost impossibly hard.
But the Lebanese civilians, from whose midst Hezbollah shoots at
Israel in the first place, have no bunkers. And for sure Hezbollah
doesn't invite them into theirs.
So they get hit when Israel shoots back. The Lebanese civilians
get hit. Instead of Hezbollah. Even though it's Hezbollah shooting
at Israel, not the civilians.
What could they be thinking? Hezbollah, that is. Why would they
dig bunkers, then shoot at Israel from among Lebanese civilians,
then duck into their bunkers and leave the civilians outside to
get hit when Israel shoots back? Why would anyone do anything like
that? Are they crazy?
Well.. maybe. In the sense that government by fundamentalism in
the 21st century is crazy. But, crazy or not, it's diabolically
clever. I understood it when Nasrallah apologized for Hezbollah
killing Israeli-Arab children. So how does a fundamentalist leader
apologize? Well, he expressed his regret. And he reiterated that
the Israeli-Arab children killed by Hezbollah were martyrs to the
cause.
That's when I got it. The fundamentalist view on civilian
casualties. Where Hezbollah's coming from. What they're thinking.
Civilian casualties are Ok for them. If Israeli – well, that's
more than Ok. That's great. That's what they're after, that's who
they target. But Lebanese casualties are Ok too. Like the
Israeli-Arab children. They're martyrs to the cause.
And that's the answer. Hezbollah has forced a great spilling of
civilian casualty blood onto the table of conflict. And although
Nasrallah would no doubt have preferred had Hezbollah proven more
competent at spilling Israeli civilian blood, he loses no sleep
over the Lebanese civilian blood spilled. Far as he's concerned,
it's all good.
From Nasrallah's perspective, it's a win-win situation. Shoot
at Israel from among Lebanese civilians, then duck into bunkers
and leave the civilians to be mowed down if Israel returns fire.
It's win-win. On one hand, maybe Israel will not return fire – for
fear of hitting innocent civilians. Bonus! But, on the other hand,
if Israel does return fire, that's no loss either. The civilians
mowed down by Israel's returning fire become martyrs to
Hezbollah's cause. Their deaths conflagrate the flames of Islamic
support. Their deaths smoulder and enflame the embers of
international resentment against Israel. Bonus!
And for Israel, it's lose-lose. If they shoot back, they often hit
innocent civilians. But if they don't shoot back – what then?
Simple. If they don't shoot back then they lose the shooting war.
And if ever Israel loses the shooting war with Islamic
fundamentalism, it's game over. For all time. If that ever happens
there won't be no talk of civilian casualties. We'll be talking
about the Israeli civilian survivors. The few of them that may
survive.
Lose-lose. But Israel must shoot back. For them, it's the lesser
of the two evils. Because if they don't, it's game over. For all
time.
There is a simple, historically proven solution. One that worked.
The only one that ever worked. Recognition of Israel's right to
exist.
It's historically proven. That's what Sadat did. On behalf of
Egypt, he acknowledged and recognized Israel's right to exist. And
the recognition was genuine. Since Sadat's recognition, Egypt
hasn't been shooting at Israel. Should any Egyptian shoot at
Israelis, he'd not be aided and abetted by Egypt. In Egypt, he'd
be acting criminally. It'd be no different, an Egyptian shooting
at Israelis, than if he were to shoot at fellow Egyptians.
Criminal. Same as an Israeli shooting at Egyptians. Criminal.
In return for genuine recognition, Israel ceased occupying the
Sinai. It returned the Sinai peninsula. It returned more land than
it was left with.
Who does that? Who gets dragged into shooting wars, wins those
shooting wars, captures and occupies more than double the
territory originally had as surety against future shooting wars –
and then returns more territory than afterwards remaining? Who
does that? Isn't the rule that stronger nations war upon and
occupy territory of weaker ones? Isn't the historical rule that
might makes right?
Israel does that. Israel breaks the historical rule. Israel
returns territory captured and occupied in self-defense.
But why? Does Israel win against overwhelming odds with such
impunity it can afford to toss away what it has hemorrhaged to
win? Nope. That's not it. Sure, the victory in 1967 was with
impunity – due to spectacular intelligence. But not in 1973, when
attacked on the holiest day of their year. Caught with their pants
not even down. Caught with their pants lost. And not in 1948. How
they won in 1948 is difficult to conceive for an atheist – like
me.
So Israel must really hope the shooting stops. Despite winning
every shooting war to date, they must hope the shooting stops
badly enough to have returned the Sinai – returned more land than
afterwards remaining them. And not like they had that much land
even with the Sinai, either.
All this, knowing if shooting starts again they might lose. Lose
and exist no more in flesh.
All this, despite history's injunction: that might makes right.
That winning is everything.
Wow. Now that's hoping. The kind of hoping that may – just may –
shape some future other than that dictated by our sad and vicious
history.
The solution is so simple. Take advantage of Israel's hoping. And
remember Sadat, for crying out loud. He took advantage of Israel's
hoping – even knowing it would cost his life. That's not only
martyrdom. Not just heroic. It's decent. He was the best of us
all.
Remember Sadat first. As you remember your martyrs, remember Sadat
foremost. He was the best of us all. And remember one more thing.
Remember the Palestinian people – the people without homeland. The
people who suffer now as the Jews once suffered. Remember the
Palestinian people – and help the Palestinian people. Not by
schooling and rewarding their suicide-murdering anyone disagreeing
your fundamentalism – murdering all you believe better off dead or
submitted to perpetual dhimmitude. That's not helping. That's
destroying. Help the Palestinian people secure their homeland.
Remember the Palestinian people. Help them secure their homeland.
Remind them to take advantage of Israel's hoping – hoping for
peace. But don't stop there. What, will you allow Israel the sole
generosity to your Arab brothers? Don't stop there. Let the
Palestinian people make their home also in the Sinai, connecting
the West Bank with Gaza. And why not also a little from Syria? Why
not? Some crumbs from your tables of plenty – why not? Have they
not suffered enough for you?
Remember the Palestinian people. Remember your martyrs. Remember
how you called them to depart prior starting your shooting in
1948. You guaranteed victory, you assured they would return to the
spoils of Israel genocided. But you haven't delivered. Not even
close. So take some responsibility. Help them. Allow them the
crumbs of your tables.
So simple, the solution. Remember Sadat. Remember the Palestinian
people. Recognize Israel.