The Last Dance
by Sher
Khan
30
April, 2006
I am not good at
dancing. However, sometimes I do attempt to amuse myself with this
complicated body act. As it happened during the last New Year's
Eve, after drinking a few glasses of special beverage that Allah
promised in the heaven, I was throwing my hands and legs in all
directions. Later, the host who arranged the party in his house
confessed he had to move some of his collection of rare artifacts
that were dangerously close to my feet. I barely missed them. I
really did not intend to dance that night but it was the
provocative song that no one could resist. You should listen to
this song as soon as possible and then you would realize what I am
talking about. Here's a part of the lyrics of the song (Mambo
number 5!, Artist-Lou Bega):
"Jump up and down
go and move it all around
Shake your head to the sound
Put your hands on the ground
Take one step left and one step right
One to the front and one to the side-.."
So far so good, I
was doing fairly well up to this point without breaking any
valuable items. My other friends were also dancing in an
articulate fashion along with their wives. However, my mind took
an abrupt turn with the next part of the song.
"A little bit of Monica in my life
a little bit of Erica by my side
a little bit of Rita is all I need
a little bit of Tina is what I see --"
By all means, I am
not a playboy and I should not have dared to be one when my wife
was dancing with me. There was a likelihood of my manhood being
chopped. Amid the clamor of music, my imagination took a defiant
flight thinking of Mohammed, the guardian of Islam, singing the
song somewhat differently.
"A little bit of Khadija in my life
a
little bit of
Zainab by my side
a little bit of Safyia is all I need
a little bit of Moyomuna is what I see
a little bit of Sawda in the sun
a little bit of Hafsah all night long
a little bit of Ayesha here I am
a little bit of you makes me your man."
It's a fact that
Mohammed had almost two dozen wives and a few concubines as a
bonus. His number of wives varies from 11 to 23, depending on
different Islamic scriptures. There is no record of Mohammed
dancing with his wives but who knows what he did in his barrack.
After all, he was a cunning politician and politicians have the
record of doing things privately that is opposite to what they
preach.
I admit it was a
fantasy; Mohammed could not have danced or sung any song. "Be
merry" is a forbidden word in Islam. Quite the opposite, Muslims
are designed to "Be gloomy" because of the scare of hell, the
scare of Allah's fire and the scare of the judgment day. Muslims
are not permitted to dance, sing or draw a picture of any living
things. Ironically, Muslims love 'Bollywood' movies that are full
of dancing, and the Middle East is a hot market for these Indian
movies. India has a beautiful cultural heritage, full of dance and
music, which melodiously shifted into the movies. It's true, some
of the movies go overboard with dancing, and there are more dances
than dialogue. Nonetheless, Sheikhs and pious Muslims watch these
movies with their glittery eyes but restrain themselves from
dancing.
The recent best
selling thriller The Da Vinci Code, written by Dan Brown,
has sold over 40 million copies worldwide and has created uproar
in the churches. According to the author, Jesus married Mary
Magdalene and had children. It may not have caused the commotion
if the theory was limited to fiction. Apparently, the idea of
Jesus being married has been floating around for a while despite
churches' objection and calling it blasphemous. (And, of course,
no church was burnt and no author was killed.) Anyway, Dan Brown
was accused and later sued for plagiarizing the thought from
another research book, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail. Brown even acknowledged the accusation and boldly commented, "That's how you incorporate research into a novel."
It does not matter
whether Jesus was married or not. I would not lose sleep over the
issue. The Bible, the holy book of the Christians, showed no
interest regarding Jesus's marital status, but the Quran gave
Mohammed a blanket permission to marry as many as he wanted, along
with the authorization of accepting the concubines at a discounted
price. I am not arguing over their holy books, which is a
completely separate issue, but what really intrigues me is the
mindset of two groups of people. Christians love Jesus as much as
Muslims adore Mohammed, yet Christians are embarrassed to think
that Jesus had one, and only one, wife, whereas eclipsed minds of
the Muslims cannot see the ugliness of a person sleeping with 23
women.
Muslims are aware
of Mohammed's sultry passion for women and apologists of this cult
often make excuses to conceal the flaw of their prophet. The most
commonly used, and the best possible, defense that they present is
so astonishing that it should be added to the agenda of "Ripley's
believe it or not". Muslim apologists argue Mohammed married women
from different tribes to create relationships with them and expand
the sphere of Islam.
Just one example
would suffice to blow apart their house of cards. Mohammed had to
make a strategic retreat from his first attempt of invading Mecca
and was forced to make a humiliating settlement - the 'Treaty of
Hudaibya'. Evidently, Mohammed's mercenaries were deprived from
possible looting. So, with an intention of robbing, he decided to
attack the Jewish tribes who settled in Khyber after being
expelled from Medina. It was an unexpected attack and the innocent
people of Khyber did not get a chance to defend themselves.
According to one of Mohammed's companions, ""We met the workers of
Khyber coming out in the morning with their spades and baskets" (Sira,
757). Although Muslim apologists put the burden on the Jews,
claiming a defensive war for the Muslims, they refuse to admit
that people don't attack with spades and baskets. Even the people
of the Stone Age used to fight with spears made of stones.
After the
massacre, "The women of Khyber were distributed among the Muslims""
(Sira, 758), and Mohammed chose Safiya d. Abul-Huqayq, the
newlywed wife of the tribe's chief. Mohammed took her to his bed
after a brief pretense of a wedding. Perhaps, if the thesis of
Muslim apologists is correct, Mohammed must have tried hard to
build a bridge between Muslims and the Jews of Khyber. The only
problem was that none of the relatives of the poor girl Safiya
were alive.
Ibn Ishaq reports
in Sirat Rasul Allah, ""Abu ayyub, Khalid b. Zayd, brother of B.
al-Najjar, passed the night girt with his sword, guarding the
apostle and going round the tent until in the morning the apostle
saw him there and asked him what he meant by this action. He
replied, 'I was afraid for you with this woman for you have
killed her father, her husband, and her people, and till
recently she was in unbelief, so I was afraid for you on her
account'"" (Sira, 766).
If the marriage
between Mohammed and Safyia was meant to develop a relationship
with other tribes, I don't know how Mohammed could have made
friends with the deceased people, especially with those whom he
killed!
It's human nature
to seek revenge when a loved one is killed, and the people of
Khyber were no exception. A Jewish woman, Zaynab d. al-Harith, put
poison in a roast lamb that was offered to Mohammed (Sira, 764).
The Muslim who took the first bite died immediately; however,
Mohammed only had a morsel of the meat and he survived. Still, it
must have been a deadly poison because Mohammed suffered the rest
of his life because of the poison. He even admitted, ""O Umm Bishr,
this is the time in which I feel a deadly pain from what I ate
with your brother at Khyber"" (Sira, 765).
Unlike "The Last
Supper", Mohammed indeed danced "The Last Dance" not joyfully but
because of the pain. Ibn Ishaq records, "Then the Messenger of
God's illness intensified, the pain became fierce, so he said,
'Pour seven skins of water over me from different wells so that I
may go out to the people and instruct them.' Aisha states: We made
him sit in a tub (mikhdab) belonging to Hafsah bt. Umar and poured
water over him until he began saying, 'Enough, enough'" (al-Tabari,
1801).
I don't enjoy
making fun of a dead person, specifically someone who died with
such a pain, but it's about time to clear the fabricated
impression created by Muslim apologists. They have changed the
history and altered the truth, they have turned a monster into an
angel, and they have succumbed to lies and deception. Had Mohammed
been a historical figure and remained as a shrewd warrior, we
would not have to worry about him. Sadly, innocent Muslims
perceive Mohammed as the symbol of a perfect human, mentor of
morality and the role model to follow. It's fascinating how a
person who snatched women and slept with them after killing their
loved ones could become a paradigm of morals and ethics! |