“Charity begins at home, and justice begins next door.”--
Charles Dickens
Sometimes when I feel lonely; I sit in silence and look back
nostalgically on my golden childhood days in school. During those
happy, carefree and all-fun days, one horrible incident took place
which became talk of the whole town and aroused few questions in
my mind.
The unpleasant incident was a murder case. One Muslim young man
killed his younger brother while fighting over the possession of a
stolen wristwatch. The boy of about seventeen years old was pushed
into an empty deep well, which killed him on the spot.
However, the story did not end there. After a month or so, our
history teacher was discussing the so-called ‘glorious’ Mughal era
of India. That day he was talking about Aurangzab, the Muslim
emperor who beheaded his brother Dara Shikoh, put his father in
house arrest for life and alienated many of his children by
driving some of them into exile and imprisoning others. As a
result, at the ebb of his life, he was lonely. Our little minds
could not accept the idea that, it is possible for a man to kill
his brother, imprison his father and ill-treat own children to
gain something. Killing and brutality within blood relations was
something unimaginable to us. The world was more peaceful during
those days than it is today. The history teacher was too
soft-natured and very old gentleman who had already crossed
retirement age and waiting for a replacement. However, some
students (myself was one of them) started arguing over this
matter. Then unfortunately one of the students went little beyond
the limit and expressed his doubt regarding the old teacher’s
knowledge in history, and the outcome was horrifying.
His reaction still shivers me even after so many years. With
red-shot eyes like a Jurassic Park’s dinosaur, he was about to
jump on us. He was so angry that, initially he was unable to say
anything except producing some sort of Godzilla like high-pitched
sound. After a minute or so he said something like this – “you
little ostriches (his choicest word to us in anger), don’t you
remember what had happened few weeks ago? Amongst Muslims, these
are very common; study history carefully. There are many examples
like this in Islam and you will see many more in the future also”.
Though he was quick to control his anger, the truth was already
out of his heart. When he referred the murder incident, we little
students had no problem to understand the truth.
That old history teacher is no more, but whenever I find
different sects of Islam are fighting and killing each other
regularly as a religious duty in Iraq and elsewhere, I remember
his million dollars worth experience which he shared with us
unintentionally.
Dr. Zakir Naik (Muslims say that he is a great orator and
highly qualified preacher) enlightened the world on ‘brotherhood’
in one of his public speech. Subhanallah, what a great
oration, what a great in-depth observation; many Muslims and
useful idiots wholeheartedly appreciated and applauded when this
great orator of Islam blew his trumpet loudly announcing that,
”….. the difference between Islam and the other Religions
is, that Islam – besides speaking of good things, it shows you a
way how to implement those good things. Like all Religions speak
about ‘Brotherhood’ – but Islam practically shows you
– it demonstrates how to practice it in your day to day life.”
But some skeptics rather scratched their heads in disbelief
because the truth seems to be something else. Leigh Meyers, a
journalist from Baghdad reported (August, 2005) as follows,
“…..June was a peak month for beheadings, May was a
record month for suicide bombings, and now (August) assassinations
and drive-by shootings are the trend. In recent weeks,
politicians, government employees and religious leaders have been
among the victims in what appears to be a coordinated campaign of
assassinations. Nobody knows who's killing whom. Even the police
don't know, everybody is vulnerable, and no part of the community
is immune…. overall violence in the world's most violent
capital keeps getting worse. July was a record month at Baghdad's
main morgue, where the bodies pile up so fast they often have to
be buried before they can be identified to make way for
the next day's arrivals."
And, this is what BBC reported during June, 2006:
“Violent deaths in Baghdad have passed 6,000 through the end
of May (2006). The bodies of 6,000 people, most of whom died
violently, have been received by Baghdad's main mortuary so far
this year, health ministry figures show. The number has risen
every month, to 1,400 in May. The majority are believed to be
victims of sectarian killings. But observers
say the real death toll could be much higher”.
Mansur (2006), by quoting Iraqi Health Minister’s estimation
reported that July 2006 was the deadliest month for Iraqi
casualties since March 2003. In addition to the violent deaths of
3,438 Iraqis (1,855 of those as a result of sectarian violence and
1,583 from bombings and shootings carried out by insurgents) about
3,600 were wounded during the same period. Also, the UN estimated
that, nearly 6,000 Iraqis were killed during May and June. It
means that the number of violent incidents are increasing and no
way leveling off.
Mansur furthermore lamented “Nor is Iraq the only place
where Muslim violence against Muslims rages unabated. There is
Darfur in Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Kashmir, Algeria until
recently, and hotspots in Iran, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia
and Nigeria, Uzbekistan, Palestine, Morocco, Egypt, Saudi Arabia
and Lebanon.” In Darfur alone, violent deaths are close to
half a million by end of September, 2006; no need to say that most
of them are Muslims killed by Muslims. The majority of Saddam’s
victims were Muslims. Saddam has had approximately 40 of his own
relatives murdered because of his unnatural suspicions (White
House Report, 2003). Still today, it is impossible to estimate
with a close accuracy about the total number of deaths of innocent
human beings during his regime. Probably Saddam himself cannot
give estimation. Every now and then new mass graves are discovered
in Iraq. Again it is needless to say that most of the victims are
Muslims.
So, it appears that the great scholar of Islam, Dr. Naik might
have mistaken somewhere knowingly or unknowingly. Hence let’s
critically analyze the matter further to find out the truth.
Today Islam is divided into 72 different sects and subsects as
per Islamic encyclopedia published by Munshi Mehboob Alim and Abu-Mansur
al-Baghdadi (cited Rauf, 2002, appendix-2) – each
has their own belief which differs from others to a great extent.
Every sect thinks that they are practicing real Islam. The irony
of the situation is that there is no central authority in Islam to
decide on this -- it is in such a religious mess.
On top of this religious chaos, a Hadith (Volume 3, Book 40,
Number 4744) from Sunaan Abu Dawud (cited Kasem, 2005, p.2)
just added fuel to the fire. It instructed Muslims to kill anyone
whoever is suspected to create disunity in Islam. This is similar
to handing over a ‘fatwa’ to virtually every sect of Islam.
Naturally every sect of Islam is at loggerheads with each other
and eliminating each other as per their belief(s) in a perfect
Islamic way. These Islamic buttheads are caught very badly in this
blood sport of taking revenge since the time of their Prophet. The
nonfighting sects just sit on the fence and watch fun till their
turn comes to participate in this game. The dirty game of revenge
propels itself further on the same ground which is already wet
with the blood of their brethren and nobody is there to stop this
one thousand and four hundred years old madness. Revenge never
stops. Blood cannot be washed away with more blood. The hate makes
its way from one generation to another. With time, the initial
cause of the fight is forgotten, but the thought of revenge
continues taking a heavy toll. This way, Islam ‘practically’ shows
the civilized world and ‘demonstrates’ how to practice
‘brotherhood’ in day to day life.
Can the great preacher of ‘Universal Brotherhood’ deny the
above mentioned facts?
This is what is happening in almost every land where Muslims
have flocked together in large numbers, unless carefully protected
by infidels from harming each other. In this religious madhouse
every sect decides and acts as per their Koranic understanding,
sheds blood and destroys each other’s property religiously. It is
such a religious hotch-potch altogether. Intoxicated with true
Islamic teaching of the Koran (which is the principal source of
all problems to the mankind) and Sunna (Muhammad’s great deeds and
great examples), Shii’tes and Sunnis attack each other’s mosque,
Ahmedi mosques or Kurdish mosques, gun down each other and this
Islamic holy practice carried on unabated. Today Muslims require a
lame excuse to kill others whom they don’t even know. The main aim
is that some bloodshed should be there – that’s all. The Koranic
teaching is such that unless you are a terrorist or criminal (or,
at least support terrorism and criminal activities) you cannot
practice your religion as a true Muslim. The bloodshed and cruelty
must be such that, it must put an animal to shame. ‘Brotherhood’
and ‘bloodbath’ are synonyms in this laughable and dangerous cult
of Muhammad.
Kasem (2005) in his excellent article ‘Cannibalizing Islam’
reported that, the Islamic tradition of killing each other started
from the time of Prophet Muhammad, when he instructed his
followers to burn and destroy a newly constructed mosque of a
rival group. As per Muhammad’s instruction his gang silently
entered the mosque and set fire to it causing panic to the
worshippers, when it was filled with people assembled for the
evening prayer. Muhammad fabricated a story expressing his fears
that the builders of the ‘Mosque of Dissent’ were planning to
assassinate him. Surprisingly, Allah, in an attempt to safeguard
his accomplice, promptly sent down revelations (Surah 9 Al Tawbah
Verses 107 & 110) to justify the demolition of opposition mosque
-- nice understanding between the two business partners; quite
fascinating indeed. Allah u akbar ! The religious practice
of ‘cannibalism’ started from here. During the time of Khulafa
Rashedin (the rightly guided caliphs) ‘Utman and Ali, the two
last caliphs were brutally murdered by fellow Muslims. ‘Utman’s
murder resulted in ‘Battle of Camel’. Over ten thousand Muslims
were killed each other in this battle (Bayt al-Hikmah, n.d).
With the red hot blood of their brothers Muslims have written
excellent examples of brotherhood in Iran-Iraq war (the eight year
long war caused death of likely more than one million people and
property loss of US$ 1.19 trillion, the Seattle times, 2003),
Iraq-Kuwait war (Gulf war, Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), genocide of
Bangladeshis during ’71 war (three million innocent Bangladeshis
were slaughtered like animals, a quarter million women were raped
and more than ten million refugees had to flee to the safety of
neighboring India to escape the brutality of the marauding
soldiers from West Pakistan. After this sacrifice Bangladesh got
its rightful place in the comity of nations; Kasem, n.d;
Hasan,1999), Darfur (in an ongoing armed conflict in the
Darfur region of western Sudan, mainly between the Janjaweed, a
militia group recruited from local Baggara tribes, and the non-Baggara
peoples of the region. By mid-2006, the death toll is over
450,000. As per ‘Arab News’ about half a million black Muslims
have died already by end September, 2006 and countless women had
been the victims of sadistic rape, torture and murder after rape.
Three million Muslims are dispossessed and driven out of safe
enclaves. The UN describes it as “the world’s worst
humanitarian disaster”, Reeves, 2006, Alibhai-Brown,
2006) and more or less almost in every Islamic country in the
world.
The Pakistani Muslims set a great example of barbaric
cannibalism when a suicide bomber blew up a crowded Sunni
gathering in Karachi on 11th April 2006, right on
Prophet Muhammad’s birthday, killing at least 57 people (including
some top religious leaders) and wounding more than 200. The blast
occurred at a stage erected in a park where religious leaders and
scores of the faithful were offering evening prayers at a meeting
to mark the birth anniversary of Prophet Muhammad (Lakshman,
2006). The thought of revenge was so intense that they could
not even spare a religious day from bloodshed. This is how the
Muslims show respect to their Prophet. On 30th June
2006, a suicide bomber with high explosives attacked funeral in
Iraq which resulted in four additional people required to be
buried. It means today no place is sacred for Muslims bent on
murder under the influence of Islamic drug.
Karachi, Pakistan’s commercial capital has seldom been out of
the headlines because of majority Sunni and minority Shiia Muslims
are at loggerheads and target each other without provocation. This
city is also a safe haven for Islamist extremists linked to the Al
Qaeda.
Now the question is -- how come the great scholar Dr. Naik
talks about Universal brotherhood, when the heroic deeds and the
great examples set by his Muslim brothers can even put an animal
to shame? Is not it ridiculous; after all Dr. Zakir Naik believed
to be an Islamic nobleman of great knowledge.
Well, either he is too ignorant on current affairs in the
Muslim world, which is just amazing or it is the great Islamic
dispensation called ‘Al-taqiyya’(Koran 3:28 and 16:106 and in
Hadith also) which Muslims had been using since time immemorial to
propagate their cult. Anyway, telling lies is a shameful act for
non-Muslims but it is religiously allowed in Islam. Prophet
Muhammad and his big brother Allah; both of them had discussed and
had legalized it to propagate their cult; otherwise Islam surely
would have failed to establish as a religion. Many Muslims
practice this enthusiastically; hence it is not a matter of shame
at all.
Whenever there is a chaos, some smart opportunists always
surface from somewhere to make a quick profit from the
pandemonium. The Mullahs have been in this business since ages and
now the great scholars are joining the crowd. Same parroting, same
proclamation; only the “label” has been changed. With more murder
and destruction this business will thrive. By the time Muslims
will understand the fact, the scholar would have made enough money
for a lifetime and might be enjoying somewhere in a civilized
infidel world vacating the post for another fellow to continue.
This will continue to happen. After Naik, somebody else will
take his place with a different “label” and different gimmick but
the show must go on. This is the musical chair of Islam. The
competition is too high, only the fittest (or, should the word be
replaced with ‘fakest’) person will occupy the chair from time to
time.
Masaallah, if the great orator Zakir Naik really cares
for Islam and Muslims, there are two immediate steps he should
take,
First, he should take up the open challenge (Sina, 2004) of Ali
Sina and agree to a written debate. Insyaallah, if the
great scholar Naik can defeat Ali with his great unparallel
Islamic knowledge and thus can close down Faith Freedom
International, it will definitely add a new feather in his cap. No
doubt a ‘scholar for dollar’ like him will be flooded with endless
offers for shows. The invitation is ‘dangling shamelessly’ on top
of Naik’s ‘Tazcat Topi’ (Muslim Prayer Cap) for quite a
long time and the whole world is watching. What a shame on the
name of Islam and the great scholar Dr. Zakir Naik!
Secondly, he should visit Baghdad and Darfur at the earliest
possible. Probably, by his great oration on Universal Brotherhood,
the dunderheads, who are at loggerheads with each other, may
forget all enmity and embrace each other with loving arms
extended. In fact his great oration may bring a sea change amongst
those Muslims and now they may even be ready to die for each
other. After all Dr. Naik is a great scholar on Islam. This way he
can save Iraq and Sudan from civil war.
My prediction is that, Naik will never make the mistake of
taking Ali’s challenge. Today the secrets of Islam are out and the
spiritual bankruptcy of this cult is clearly visible under the
light of truth. His tricks of ‘twisting the truth’ and jugglery
with words will not work in a written debate. Hence there is no
way he can win a written debate, and he knows it very well. All is
not gold that glitters. Magician Naik fails here.
Secondly, he will never think of going to Baghdad or Darfur in
the present situation, particularly after the Karachi incident.
Naik is of course very knowledgeable and he knows the Muslims more
than anybody else. He does not want to endanger his life. It is
better to preach “brotherhood” by maintaining a safe distance from
the ‘unbrotherly’ brothers, is not it? After all, own life is
precious for everybody.
Muslims will never stop from loving each other to death with
joy in their hearts, because Islam is a cult of death. When other
religions talk about life, freedom & purification of soul and
spiritual upbringing; Islam talks about death and earthly gain in
afterlife. The prophet of Islam was so spiritually deprived that
he could not see anything beyond self-sealing virgins, river of
wine and pearl-like boys for same-sex pleasure even after death.
The all-merciful God of Islam will never be happy unless the
followers offer some hot human blood to him regularly. Allah does
not mind if it is Muslim blood. Both Muslim and non-Muslim blood
is equally delicious for this evil spirit to lick. The God of
Islam is a sadist. Hate, deception, murder and suicide are the
essential elements of this seventh century cult. Ayatollah
Khomeini was very right when he said, "To kill and to be killed
for Allah is a Muslim's greatest joy" (Merrill, 2002).
A true Muslim gets his religious dividend after death only. In
Islam; love, kindness, forgiveness and tolerance are serious
religious taboos and death is more important than life. This is
the bottom line of spirituality of this dangerous cult. But the
irony is that, once in a while, some so-called great Islamic
scholars will keep on popping up from here and there, to teach
precious lessons of moral values, decency, world peace and
universal brotherhood to the civilized world. Naik is just one
small element. With time many more Islamic scholars similar to him
will appear like mushrooms thrive in rotting piles of garbage. The
comedy and tragedy of Islam will continue with hands together for
the urbane world to see the drama and get confused.
------------------
Reference list
- Alibhai-Brown Y.
(2006); Darfur: Where Are the Protesting Muslims? Arab News, 24TH
Sept/2006 URL:
http://arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=87083&d=24&m=9&y=2006
- Bayt al-Hikmah,
On-line Books,The Battle of the Camel URL:
http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Articles/companion/53_ali_bin_talib.htm
- BBC Report (2006), Violent
Baghdad deaths top 6,000, Dated 6th June 2006. URL :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5053134.stm
-
Hasan
J. (1999), Balkan Tragedy: A Re-enactment of the 1971 Genocide
in Bangladesh.
- Kasem A (2005), Cannibalizing
Islam, Faith Freedom International, URL:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/AbulKasen50920.htm
- Kasem A. (n.d), Still
Searching the Real Islam, Faith Freedom International; URL:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/abulkazem/realislam.htm
- Lakshman K,
(2006); Karachi: Metropolis of Terror; South Asia Intelligence
Review. URL:
http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/sair/Archives/4_40.htm
- Mansur S.
(2006), News Columnist; When Muslims kill Muslims, Toronto Sun.
Sat, August 26 / 06 issue. URL:
http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Mansur_Salim/2006/08/26/1777155.html
- Merrill Z. H (2002), ISLAM:
Submission to Allah through Murder and Suicide. URL:
http://www.bloomington.in.us/~lgthscac/islam.htm.
- Meyers L., (2005), [lbo-talk]
A Busy Month At Baghdad's Main Morgue URL:
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20050808/017305.html
- Naik Z.;
Universal Brotherhood by Dr. Zakir Naik; DOC version URL:
http://www.irf.net/universalbrotherhood.doc
- Rauf, (2002):
Appendix II: Sects in Islam, URL:
http://www.real-islam.org/73_8.htm
- Reeves E, (2006), Wikipedia,
URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Reeves
- Sina A. (2004); Dr. Zakir
Naik - An Invitation to Debate. Dated, 2004/12/11, the
negative response by Admin team and Sina’s response through
e-mail. The Challenge to debate with Dr. Zakir Naik. URL:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/ZakirNaik.htm
- The Seattle Times, (2003),
Two Wars, No Wins, Dated 3rd January, 2003 URL:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/nation-world/usiraq/turmoil/
- The White House Report,
(2003), Life Under Saddam Hussein ,Past Repression and
Atrocities by Saddam Hussein's Regime. Dated 4th
April 2003, Operation Iraq Report. URL:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/04/20030404-1.html