Just like India and Pakistan, North Korea is now a nuclear
power. Iran will soon join the club. The irony is that it seems
that nobody can do anything about it. The direction in which
things are moving suggest that the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty will soon be a thing of the past as more and more of its
members will choose not to fulfill their obligations under Article
VI of the Treaty to engage in good faith efforts to achieve
nuclear disarmament.
Experts are certain that sooner or later Japan and South Korea
will reconsider their nuclear options and as soon as Iran
detonates its own nuclear devise, Turkey and Saudi Arabia will
also jump in the fray. According to Los Angeles Times, Brazil has
recently inaugurated a uranium enrichment program and several
other countries including Argentina and South Africa are on the
verge of beginning theirs. The report says that Australia, which
has large supplies of natural uranium, is also considering an
enrichment program [ Ref 1
].
One of the reasons for this rush to join the nuclear club is
the collapse of the security arrangements that had kept the world
in balance all throughout the Cold War. Almost all of the
developing and underdeveloped nations were part of one defense
pact or the other. Even the so called non-aligned nations found a
way to exploit the super power rivalry to protect their security
interests. But as the Supreme Soviet lost its moorings and the
United States of America emerged as the sole super power, the need
for various security pacts or a defense treaties also disappeared.
Now every country finds itself alone and responsible for its
own defenses. Pakistan, a traditional participant in most of the
U.S. sponsored regional defense arrangements, does not enjoy the
security of South Asian Treaty Organization (SEATO), Central
Treaty Organization (CENTO) or Regional Cooperation for
Development (RCD) in the post cold war world. India, its arch
rival, on the other hand, that had always championed the causes of
non-Align movement is the closest strategic partner of the U.S.
Iran, another Cold War ally of the U.S. is now run by a regime
that has a totally fascist agenda based on its anti-American and
anti-Semitic ideology. It has to find a way to be able to continue
challenging the Judeo-Christian powers.
Similarly many of the Warsaw Pact nations also find themselves
defenseless and exposed in a world without the Soviet Union. Some
countries in the Middle East like Syria, Iraq and Egypt that found
it convenient to side with Moscow are still struggling to make
sense of the changed world. Gone are the days when their
governments could play Washington against Moscow. Now whether they
like it or not there is only one super power and they will have to
deal with it. And most of these countries do not like it. They are
afraid and feel insecure. And the signals coming out of Washington
have not helped much.
U.S. declaration that it intends to expand the scope of
circumstances under which nuclear weapons could be used,
exasperated the situation. The Nuclear Posture Review (NPR)
broadened potential nuclear targets to include Iraq, Iran, North
Korea, Libya, Syria, China and Russia. According to William M.
Arkin in the Los Angeles Times (“Secret Plan Outlines the
Unthinkable,” 3/10/01), the US planed to use nuclear weapons in
what would formerly have been conventional missions. The NPR
specifically stated that the U.S. will consider using nuclear
weapons against China in a military confrontation over Taiwan,
nuking Iraq should that country attack Israel or another country,
launching a nuclear attack against North Korea should it attack
South Korea and using nukes in the Arab-Israeli conflict. The
Nuclear Posture Review also declared that the US may use nuclear
weapons in retaliation for a non-nuclear attack, or “in the event
of surprising military developments.” According to Arkin,
“officials are looking for nuclear weapons that could play a role
in the kinds of challenges the United States faces with Al Qaeda.”
According to NPR, in addition to broadening the potential use
of nuclear weapons, Washington planed to more fully integrate
nuclear forces in conventional warfare and intended sweeping
upgrades for the US nuclear arsenal. The NPR included plans to
modify conventional cruise missiles, along with the F-35 Joint
Strike Fighter, to carry nuclear warheads. It also called for the
development of “bunker busters,” nuclear weapons that would be
used in conventional conflict to destroy underground complexes.
The NPR called for more resources to be dedicated to upgrading the
US nuclear weapons infrastructure, in order to further develop,
produce, and test nuclear weapons [ Ref
2 ].
Countries like Pakistan, Iran, and North Korea have long nursed
a fear that the U.S. is bent upon making them subservient to its
“hegemonic” agenda. They sincerely believed that the only way to
save themselves from being blackmailed, threatened and attacked by
Judeo-Christian and capitalistic powers is to develop their own
nuclear capability. For them the acquisition of the weapons of
mass destruction was not a luxury but a necessity weapon for self
defense. And the messages that were conveyed by documents like the
Nuclear Posture review confirmed their apprehensions. That’s why
they could not be stopped from pursuing their nuclear programs.
Consequently, as the situation exists today, it is very hard to
convince any country not to pursue its own nuclear project. And
the fact that the development of nuclear weapons is much cheaper
than acquiring the conventional ones complicates the situation
drastically. Nuclear weapons are basically poor nation’s weapons –
they cost less and are easy to develop.
Another factor that encouraged the poor nations to believe that
they can succeed in owning the nuclear bomb without any hindrance
from outside was the absence of an agency with adequate authority
to enforce the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPT) on them. There
were states that detonated their nuclear devises and were not
punished in a manner that could have served as deterrence for
others. The best examples of such states is that India and
Pakistan.
So here we are. Another country has gate crashed the nuclear
party and many others are in line. The most important question is
whether some of the new members of the nuclear club will transfer
nuclear assets to the non-state entities? This is not an ordinary
question but an existential one. The world has to find the answer
if it wants to survive this crisis.
Read more about the nuclear powers in part two of this article,
due out later in the week.
Source:
FamilySecurityMatters.org